Literature DB >> 17997681

Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation?

Benjamin Thompson1, Bruce C Hansen, Robert F Hess, Nikolaus F Troje.   

Abstract

Biological motion perception, having both evolutionary and social importance, is performed by the human visual system with a high degree of sensitivity. It is unclear whether peripheral vision has access to the specialized neural systems underlying biological motion perception; however, given the motion component, one would expect peripheral vision to be, if not specialized, at least highly accurate in perceiving biological motion. Here we show that the periphery can indeed perceive biological motion. However, the periphery suffers from an inability to detect biological motion signals when they are embedded in dynamic visual noise. We suggest that this peripheral deficit is not due to biological motion perception per se, but to signal/noise segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997681     DOI: 10.1167/7.10.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  What you see is what you get: motor resonance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Antonella Leonetti; Guglielmo Puglisi; Roma Siugzdaite; Clarissa Ferrari; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Backward-walking biological motion orients attention to moving away instead of moving toward.

Authors:  Xiaowei Ding; Jun Yin; Rende Shui; Jifan Zhou; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Li Wang; Qian Xu; Dong Liu; Lihong Chen; Nikolaus F Troje; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting.

Authors:  Jinfu Shi; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-29

6.  fMR-Adaptation Reveals Invariant Coding of Biological Motion on the Human STS.

Authors:  Emily D Grossman; Nicole L Jardine; John A Pyles
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Healthy older observers cannot use biological-motion point-light information efficiently within 4 m of themselves.

Authors:  Isabelle Legault; Nikolaus F Troje; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-02-21

8.  Deficient biological motion perception in schizophrenia: results from a motion noise paradigm.

Authors:  Jejoong Kim; Daniel Norton; Ryan McBain; Dost Ongur; Yue Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-04

9.  Local and global aspects of biological motion perception in children born at very low birth weight.

Authors:  K E Williamson; L S Jakobson; D R Saunders; N F Troje
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Developmental tuning of reflexive attentional effect to biological motion cues.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Li Wang; Ying Wang; Xuchu Weng; Su Li; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.