BACKGROUND: Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing induces electrophysiological and structural remodeling. Cardiac memory (CM) evolves during the course of pacing and is readily apparent on electrocardiography (ECG) or vectorcardiography (VCG) when normal ventricular activation resumes. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess ventricular repolarization (VR) changes during pacing and intermittent normal ventricular conduction by ECG and VCG and to determine the temporal and conformational evolution of CM. METHODS: Twenty sick sinus patients received a dual-chamber rate-adaptive (DDD-R) pacemaker and were paced from the RVA endocardium. The pacemakers were programmed to a short AV delay to maximize ventricular preexcitation. The ECG and VCG were recorded before and 1 day after implantation, and then daily for the first week (n=6) or weekly for 5 to 8 weeks (n=14), with the pacemakers temporarily programmed to AAI (normal ventricular activation). RESULTS: The first parameters to change were T-vector amplitude, T(area), and T(peak)-T(end) (T(p-e)), which decreased within 1 day after initiating pacing. CM became apparent between day 1 and day 3, was fully established after 1 week, and then remained stable. Signs of increased VR heterogeneity were observed as the T loop became more circular (decreased T(egenv)) and distorted (increased T(avplan)), which have previously been observed in conditions with increased risk for arrhythmias. Over weeks, VR duration was prolonged (increased QTc). In contrast, during ventricular pacing, a gradual shortening of the repolarization time was observed, suggesting a stabilizing adaptive process. CONCLUSION: In sick sinus syndrome patients in whom ventricular pacing is indicated, switching between normal AV conduction and ventricular pacing should be minimized to avoid periods of repolarization instability.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing induces electrophysiological and structural remodeling. Cardiac memory (CM) evolves during the course of pacing and is readily apparent on electrocardiography (ECG) or vectorcardiography (VCG) when normal ventricular activation resumes. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess ventricular repolarization (VR) changes during pacing and intermittent normal ventricular conduction by ECG and VCG and to determine the temporal and conformational evolution of CM. METHODS: Twenty sick sinus patients received a dual-chamber rate-adaptive (DDD-R) pacemaker and were paced from the RVA endocardium. The pacemakers were programmed to a short AV delay to maximize ventricular preexcitation. The ECG and VCG were recorded before and 1 day after implantation, and then daily for the first week (n=6) or weekly for 5 to 8 weeks (n=14), with the pacemakers temporarily programmed to AAI (normal ventricular activation). RESULTS: The first parameters to change were T-vector amplitude, T(area), and T(peak)-T(end) (T(p-e)), which decreased within 1 day after initiating pacing. CM became apparent between day 1 and day 3, was fully established after 1 week, and then remained stable. Signs of increased VR heterogeneity were observed as the T loop became more circular (decreased T(egenv)) and distorted (increased T(avplan)), which have previously been observed in conditions with increased risk for arrhythmias. Over weeks, VR duration was prolonged (increased QTc). In contrast, during ventricular pacing, a gradual shortening of the repolarization time was observed, suggesting a stabilizing adaptive process. CONCLUSION: In sick sinus syndromepatients in whom ventricular pacing is indicated, switching between normal AV conduction and ventricular pacing should be minimized to avoid periods of repolarization instability.
Authors: Pablo A Chiale; Julio D Pastori; Hugo A Garro; Luciano Faivelis; Oscar Ianovsky; Rubén A Sánchez; Carlos B Alvarez; Mario D González; Marcelo V Elizari Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Farzad Vahedi; Michael F Haney; Steen M Jensen; Ulf Näslund; Lennart Bergfeldt Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Darwin Jeyaraj; Xiaoping Wan; Eckhard Ficker; Julian E Stelzer; Isabelle Deschenes; Haiyan Liu; Lance D Wilson; Keith F Decker; Tamer H Said; Mukesh K Jain; Yoram Rudy; David S Rosenbaum Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Artur Klimczak; Adam S Budzikowski; Marcin Rosiak; Marzenna Zielińska; Bożena Urbanek; Karol Bartczak; Michał Chudzik; Jerzy K Wranicz Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 1.468