Literature DB >> 17993638

Who is most at risk for intimate partner violence? A Canadian population-based study.

Sarah Romans1, Tonia Forte, Marsha M Cohen, Janice Du Mont, Ilene Hyman.   

Abstract

Whole population studies on intimate partner violence (IPV) have given contradictory information about prevalence and risk factors, especially concerning gender. The authors examined the 1999 Canadian General Social Survey data for gender patterns of physical, sexual, emotional, or financial IPV from a current or ex-partner. More women (8.6%) than men (7.0%, p = .001) reported partner physical abuse in general, physical IPV causing physical injury (p < .0001), sexual abuse (1.7% vs. 0.2%, p < .0001), and financial abuse (4.1% vs. 1.6%, p < .0001). There were no gender differences for partner emotional abuse. Significant risk factors after multivariate modeling for physical/sexual IPV were younger age, being divorced/separated or single, having children in the household, and poor self-rated physical health. These findings from a large, randomly generated data set further refine our understanding of the risk profile for IPV in the developed world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17993638     DOI: 10.1177/0886260507306566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  27 in total

1.  Risk of Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Conflict Following Couple-Based HIV Prevention Counseling: Results From the Harlem River Couples Project.

Authors:  James M McMahon; Ruth Chimenti; Nicole Trabold; Theresa Fedor; Mona Mittal; Stephanie Tortu
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2015-08-27

2.  Urban teens and young adults describe drama, disrespect, dating violence and help-seeking preferences.

Authors:  Caitlin Eileen Martin; Avril Melissa Houston; Kristin N Mmari; Michele R Decker
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-07

Review 3.  [Social aspects of emergency calls in the rescue service].

Authors:  Maria Theresa Völker; Nora Jahn; Udo Kaisers; Sven Laudi; Lars Knebel; Sven Bercker
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Recent violence in a community-based sample of homeless and unstably housed women with high levels of psychiatric comorbidity.

Authors:  Elise D Riley; Jennifer Cohen; Kelly R Knight; Alyson Decker; Kara Marson; Martha Shumway
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  A systematic review of the epidemiology of nonfatal strangulation, a human rights and health concern.

Authors:  Susan B Sorenson; Manisha Joshi; Elizabeth Sivitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Violence and self-reported health: does individual socioeconomic position matter?

Authors:  Rocio Winnersjö; Antonio Ponce de Leon; Joaquim F Soares; Gloria Macassa
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2011-05-05

7.  Psychometric properties of the WHO Violence Against Women instrument in a female population-based sample in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lotta Nybergh; Charles Taft; Gunilla Krantz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  An exploratory study on the consequences and contextual factors of intimate partner violence among immigrant and Canadian-born women.

Authors:  Janice Du Mont; Tonia Forte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Lifetime intimate partner violence exposure, attitudes and comfort among Canadian health professions students.

Authors:  Megan R Gerber; André K W Tan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-09-23

10.  Intimate partner violence against women in Maputo city, Mozambique.

Authors:  Antonio Eugenio Zacarias; Gloria Macassa; Leif Svanström; Joaquim Jf Soares; Diddy Antai
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.