Literature DB >> 26319710

Risk of Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Conflict Following Couple-Based HIV Prevention Counseling: Results From the Harlem River Couples Project.

James M McMahon1, Ruth Chimenti2, Nicole Trabold1, Theresa Fedor1, Mona Mittal3, Stephanie Tortu4.   

Abstract

Heterosexual transmission of HIV often occurs in the context of intimate sexual partnerships. There is mounting evidence that couple-based HIV prevention interventions may be more effective than individual-based interventions for promoting risk reduction within such relationships. Yet, concerns have been raised about the safety of couple-based prevention approaches, especially with regard to the risk of intimate partner violence against women. Although several international studies have examined the potential for adverse consequences associated with couple-based interventions, with inconsistent results, there is little data from U.S. studies to shed light on this issue. The current study analyzed data from a randomized trial conducted in New York City with 330 heterosexual couples to examine whether participation in couple-based or relationship-focused HIV counseling and testing (HIV-CT) interventions resulted in an increased likelihood of post-intervention breakups, relationship conflicts, or emotional, physical, or sexual abuse, compared with standard individual HIV-CT. Multinomial logistic regression was used to model the odds of experiencing change in partner violence from baseline to follow-up by treatment condition. A high prevalence of partner-perpetrated violence was reported by both male and female partners across treatment conditions, but there was no conclusive evidence of an increase in relationship dissolution or partner violence subsequent to participation in either the couple-based HIV-CT intervention or relationship-focused HIV-CT intervention compared with controls. Qualitative data collected from the same participants support this interpretation. HIV prevention interventions involving persons in primary sexual partnerships should be sensitive to relationship dynamics and the potential for conflict, and take precautions to protect the safety of both male and female participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV prevention; couple-based counseling; intimate partner violence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319710      PMCID: PMC4769677          DOI: 10.1177/0886260515600878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  47 in total

1.  Causal analysis of individual change using the difference score.

Authors:  Paul S Clarke
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Losing the "gender" in gender-based violence: the missteps of research on dating and intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Elizabeth Reed; Anita Raj; Elizabeth Miller; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2010-03

3.  The forgotten half of the equation: randomized controlled trial of a male invitation to attend couple voluntary counselling and testing.

Authors:  Boshishi K F Mohlala; Marie-Claude Boily; Simon Gregson
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Domestic violence and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1.

Authors:  James N Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Barbra A Richardson; Marjory N Kabura; Francis N John; Ruth W Nduati; Grace C John-Stewart
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Problem drinking and intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Helene Raskin White; Ping-Hsin Chen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2002-03

6.  Positive and negative life events after counselling and testing: the Voluntary HIV-1 Counselling and Testing Efficacy Study.

Authors:  O A Grinstead; S E Gregorich; K H Choi; T Coates
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Women's responses to sexual abuse in intimate relationships.

Authors:  J C Campbell
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1989

8.  Increasing HIV testing among male partners.

Authors:  Joanna Orne-Gliemann; Eric Balestre; Patrice Tchendjou; Marija Miric; Shrinivas Darak; Maia Butsashvili; Eddy Perez-Then; Fred Eboko; Melanie Plazy; Sanjeevani Kulkarni; Annabel Desgrées du Loû; François Dabis
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  The Case for Use of Simple Difference Scores to Test the Significance of Differences in Mean Rates of Change in Controlled Repeated Measurements Designs.

Authors:  John E Overall; Scott Tonidandel
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Women's self-disclosure of HIV infection: rates, reasons, and reactions.

Authors:  J M Simoni; H R Mason; G Marks; M S Ruiz; D Reed; J L Richardson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  HIV-Related Communication and Safe Sex Practices among Heterosexual Black Men: A Qualitative Report.

Authors:  Keosha T Bond; Victoria Frye; Malik Cupid; Debbie Lucy; Beryl A Koblin
Journal:  J Black Sex Relatsh       Date:  2018

2.  Can Women Safely Distribute HIV Oral Self-test Kits to Their Sexual Partners? Results From a Pilot Study in Kenya.

Authors:  Kawango Agot; Samuel H Masters; Gift-Noelle Wango; Harsha Thirumurthy
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  The Magnetic Couples Study: protocol for a mixed methods prospective cohort study of HIV-serodifferent heterosexual couples' perspectives and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Authors:  James M McMahon; Janie Simmons; Jessica E Haberer; Sharon Mannheimer; Natalie M Leblanc; Leilani Torres; Robert Quiles; Guillermo Aedo; Anabel Javier; Amy Braksmajer; Graham Harriman; Nicole Trabold; Enrique R Pouget; Ann Kurth; Martez D R Smith; Judith Brasch; Eric J Podsiadly; Peter L Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.