Literature DB >> 17985793

Near visual acuity for everyday activities with accommodative and monofocal intraocular lenses.

Donald R Sanders1, Monica L Sanders.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the levels of functional near visual acuity required for everyday social reading activities and to compare the levels to those attained with accommodative and monofocal intraocular lenses (LOLs).
METHODS: Font size equivalencies of an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study near chart and a variety of commonly read print objects were determined and correlated to the findings of distance-corrected near vision measurements with 2 accommodative (Tetraflex, 1CU) and 1 monofocal (Acrysof MA30) IOLs.
RESULTS: The smallest print objects studied were sweetener packets with type between 20/40 (Jaeger [J] 5) and 20/50 (J6). Type in classified ads, stock quotations, and pocket bibles was 20/50 (J6), type in a telephone directory was 20/63 (J8), and type in standard newspapers, journals, and magazines was 20/80 (J9). Tested monocularly, 88% of Tetraflex, 40% of ICU, and 7% of Acrysof MA30 eyes had distance-corrected near vision sufficient to read newspaper and telephone directory print, and 63% of Tetraflex, 30% of 1CU, and 0% of Acrysof MA30 eyes could read classified ads, stock quotations, and pocket bibles, respectively. Tested binocularly after bilateral implantation, 96% of Tetraflex patients could read telephone directory print and 89% could read ads, stock quotations, and pocket bibles.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional near visual acuity is not equivalent to the bottom-line objective at 20/20 (J1) near visual acuity. No print size was found at or smaller than 20/40 (J5), indicating that a requirement of nearly perfect near visual acuity, while desirable, may not be necessary for patients' social reading needs for accommodative IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17985793     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20071001-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of through-focus image quality across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Daozhi Wang; Griffith E Altmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

2.  Classification of Presbyopia by Severity.

Authors:  Marguerite B McDonald; Melissa Barnett; Ian B Gaddie; Paul Karpecki; Francis Mah; Kelly K Nichols; William B Trattler
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-10-28

3.  Factors associated with good near vision after cataract surgery with monofocal intraocular lens implantation at a tertiary eye hospital in southern India.

Authors:  Soujanya Kaup; Abhilasha Charugundla; Siddharudha Shivalli
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-29

4.  Clinical outcomes with a low add multifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lenses both implanted with mini-monovision.

Authors:  Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Semra Akkaya Turhan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Correlation Between Vision and Cognitive Function in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Oriel Spierer; Naomi Fischer; Adiel Barak; Michael Belkin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.