Literature DB >> 17978650

Vertebral endplate and disc changes in the aging sand rat lumbar spine: cross-sectional analyses of a large male and female population.

Helen E Gruber1, Brian Gordon, Cliff Williams, H James Norton, Edward N Hanley.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Lumbar vertebral segments from a large cross-sectional population of male and female sand rats were assessed for quantitative determination of lumbar endplate bone mineral density (BMD) and radiologic features.
OBJECTIVE: To determine radiologic and BMD characteristics in the lumbar spines of males and females ranging in age from 1.5 to 46.0 months. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sand rat provides an excellent economical model in which disc degeneration is reliable and well characterized. A major advantage of this model is that disc degeneration is spontaneous and does not need to be induced by stab surgical procedures. Previous work has only examined a small group of male sand rats for radiologic and BMD features of the lumbar spine; more complete data on both genders and a wider age range are lacking.
METHODS: BMD data were obtained for 99 male or female sand rats aged 1.5 to 46.0 months using the GE Lunar PIXImus bone densitometer; results were assessed for changes related to age, weight, gender, lumbar vertebral site, and radiologic characteristics of disc degeneration (disc space narrowing, wedging, and endplate calcification). Four age groups were studied: Group 1, 1 to 3.9 months of age; Group 2, 4 to 11.9 months of age; Group 3, 12 to 23.9 months of age, and Group 4, 24 to 46 months of age.
RESULTS: Group 1 females showed a greater incidence of radiologic disc space narrowing and wedging at L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, and of wedging at sites L5-L6, L6-L7, and L7-S. Group 2 females had significantly greater disc space narrowing at L3-L4 and L4-L5. By the time animals reached the age of Groups 3 and 4, males showed more wedging at L1-L2 and L3-L4. BMD data showed that Group 1 females had significantly lower BMD than Groups 2, 3 and 4 at all lumbar levels, and Group 4 had significantly higher BMD than Group 3. For males, there were no differences in younger animals, but older Group 3 and 4 animals had significantly greater BMD than Groups 1 and 2. Caudal BMD values were generally significantly higher than cranial values. Averaged BMD levels correlated significantly with both age and body weight, but the correlation with age at each lumbar level accounted for much more of the variation than did weight. Averaged BMD was significantly greater in disc sites showing disc space narrowing than in sites without narrowing for L1-L2 and L3-L4 through L7-S (P < or = 0.002 for each spinal level).
CONCLUSION: Results expand our understanding of the association of age and gender to endplate sclerosis patterns in the lumbar spine, and support the hypothesis that endplate sclerosis may play a role in disc degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17978650     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cd69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Accelerated aging of intervertebral discs in a mouse model of progeria.

Authors:  Nam Vo; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Andria Robinson; Gwendolyn Sowa; Douglas Bentley; Lauren Taylor; Rebecca Studer; Arvydas Usas; Johnny Huard; Sean Alber; Simon C Watkins; Joon Lee; Paulo Coehlo; Dong Wang; Mattia Loppini; Paul D Robbins; Laura J Niedernhofer; James Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Senile osteoporosis is associated with disc degeneration.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-07

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of biological aging in intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Nam V Vo; Robert A Hartman; Prashanti R Patil; Makarand V Risbud; Dimitris Kletsas; James C Iatridis; Judith A Hoyland; Christine L Le Maitre; Gwendolyn A Sowa; James D Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  The expression of osteoprotegerin is required for maintaining the intervertebral disc endplate of aged mice.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Liang; Xiao-Feng Li; Quan Zhou; Lianping Xing; Shao-Dan Cheng; Dao-Fang Ding; Le-Qin Xu; De-Zhi Tang; Qin Bian; Zhi-Jie Xi; Chongjian Zhou; Qi Shi; Yong-Jun Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  In vivo and in vitro analysis of rat lumbar spine mechanics.

Authors:  Matthew E Cunningham; Jocelyn M Beach; Serkan Bilgic; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Chisa Hidaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Proper animal experimental designs for preclinical research of biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration.

Authors:  Yizhong Peng; Xiangcheng Qing; Hongyang Shu; Shuo Tian; Wenbo Yang; Songfeng Chen; Hui Lin; Xiao Lv; Lei Zhao; Xi Chen; Feifei Pu; Donghua Huang; Xu Cao; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-06-28

7.  Nanofibrous spongy microspheres to deliver rabbit mesenchymal stem cells and anti-miR-199a to regenerate nucleus pulposus and prevent calcification.

Authors:  Ganjun Feng; Zhanpeng Zhang; Ming Dang; Kunal J Rambhia; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  The effects of osteoporosis and disc degeneration on vertebral cartilage endplate lesions in rats.

Authors:  Yin Ding; Jie Jiang; Jian Zhou; Xiuhua Wu; Zhiping Huang; Jianting Chen; Qingan Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  An overview of underlying causes and animal models for the study of age-related degenerative disorders of the spine and synovial joints.

Authors:  Nam Vo; Laura J Niedernhofer; Luigi Aurelio Nasto; Lloydine Jacobs; Paul D Robbins; James Kang; Christopher H Evans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Intervertebral disc degeneration and regeneration: a motion segment perspective.

Authors:  B Ashinsky; H E Smith; R L Mauck; S E Gullbrand
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.