Literature DB >> 17978649

Biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro.

Dong-Liang Wang1, Sheng-Dan Jiang, Li-Yang Dai.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study attempts to determine the biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro.
OBJECTIVE: To quantitate and compare the changes of histology, Type I and II collagens, aggrecan, interleukin (IL)-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha expression, and apoptosis in rabbit intervertebral discs following static and dynamic compression in vitro. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compressive stimuli associated with weight-bearing and loading of the intervertebral disc are thought to be important regulators of disc cell metabolism. Very little is known about the different types of mechanical stimuli that may achieve regulation of intervertebral disc cell metabolism. We examined the biologic response of the rabbit intervertebral discs when exposed to static and dynamic compression in vitro.
METHODS: The rabbit intervertebral disc explants were in vitro subjected to unconfined uniaxial compression. Static compression of 0.5 and 1 MPa and dynamic compression of 0.5 and 1 MPa were applied at the frequency of 0.1 and 1 Hz for 6 hours, respectively. After loaded with different types of mechanical stimuli, disc explants were examined for histologic changes, collagen I, collagen II, aggrecan, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha expression, and apoptosis.
RESULTS: The static compressive load was found to suppress gene expression for collagens and aggrecan in the disc, whereas the disc under dynamic compression exhibited significant anabolic change with increase in gene expression for Type I and II collagen and aggrecan. The regional difference of the responses to mechanical loading in vitro was found between the anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. All loading conditions caused marked histologic changes, up-regulation of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha expression, and increase in TUNEL-positive cells in the intervertebral discs, with the most significant from control was that when statically loaded.
CONCLUSION: Mechanical loading is involved in the physiology and pathology of disc degeneration. Static and dynamic compression may induce different biologic response of the intervertebral disc: static compression has catabolic role on the disc, whereas the dynamic load at appropriate level may benefit the synthetic activity and anabolic response of the disc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17978649     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cb61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  54 in total

1.  High frequency of McKenzie's postural syndrome in young population of non-care seeking individuals.

Authors:  Stephen May; Gauri Nanche; Sampada Pingle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

Review 2.  Diversity of intervertebral disc cells: phenotype and function.

Authors:  Girish Pattappa; Zhen Li; Marianna Peroglio; Nadine Wismer; Mauro Alini; Sibylle Grad
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Duration-dependent influence of dynamic torsion on the intervertebral disc: an intact disc organ culture study.

Authors:  Samantha C W Chan; Jochen Walser; Stephen J Ferguson; Benjamin Gantenbein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Zonal variations in cytoskeletal element organization, mRNA and protein expression in the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Siyuan Li; Victor C Duance; Emma J Blain
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Enhancement of Energy Production of the Intervertebral Disc by the Implantation of Polyurethane Mass Transfer Devices.

Authors:  Yu-Fu Wang; Howard B Levene; Weiyong Gu; C -Y Charles Huang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Effects of compressive loading on biomechanical properties of disc and peripheral tissue in a rat tail model.

Authors:  Tomokazu Nakamura; Takaro Iribe; Yoshinori Asou; Hiroo Miyairi; Kozo Ikegami; Kazuo Takakuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Samantha C W Chan; Stephen J Ferguson; Benjamin Gantenbein-Ritter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Intradiscal pressure depends on recent loading and correlates with disc height and compressive stiffness.

Authors:  Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Development of an ex vivo cavity model to study repair strategies in loaded intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Patrick Lezuo; Girish Pattappa; Estelle Collin; Mauro Alini; Sibylle Grad; Marianna Peroglio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Intervertebral disc cell response to dynamic compression is age and frequency dependent.

Authors:  Casey L Korecki; Catherine K Kuo; Rocky S Tuan; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.