Literature DB >> 26914460

Derived relations moderate the association between changes in the strength of commitment language and cocaine treatment response.

Kenneth M Carpenter1, Paul C Amrhein2, Krysten W Bold3, Kaitlyn Mishlen1, Frances R Levin1, Wilfrid N Raby1, Suzette M Evans1, Richard W Foltin1, Edward V Nunes1.   

Abstract

The psycholinguistic analysis of client-counselor interactions indicates that how individuals talk about their substance use is associated with treatment outcome. However, the processes by which client speech influences out-of-session behaviors have not been clearly delineated. This study investigated the relationships between deriving relations-a key behavioral process by which language and cognition may come to influence behavior, shifts in the strength of client talk in favor of change, and treatment outcome among 75 cocaine-dependent participants (23% Female). Participants were trained to relate cocaine words, nonsense syllables, and negative-consequence words and were then assessed for a derived relation of equivalence before starting treatment. The DARN-C coding system was used to quantify the strength of participant speech during an early cognitive behavior therapy counseling session. Cocaine use during treatment was the outcome of interest. The analyses (a) characterized the process of deriving relations among individuals seeking help for their misuse of cocaine, (b) tested the relationships between shifts in the strength of participants' speech in favor of change and treatment outcome, and (c) tested if deriving equivalence relations moderated the relationship between shifts in the strength of in-session speech and treatment response. Results indicated that a minority of participants derived equivalence relations, however increases in the strength of commitment language predicted less cocaine use during treatment only among those who did. The findings suggest deriving relations may be an important process by which changes in the strength of commitment language comes to influence substance use. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26914460      PMCID: PMC7289513          DOI: 10.1037/pha0000063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  43 in total

1.  The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda M Vader; Scott T Walters; Gangamma Chenenda Prabhu; Jon M Houck; Craig A Field
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2010-06

2.  Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: a model for natural categories.

Authors:  L Fields; K F Reeve; B J Adams; T Verhave
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations.

Authors:  S C Hayes; B S Kohlenberg; L J Hayes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Expanding the lens of evidence-based practice in psychotherapy: a common factors perspective.

Authors:  Kevin M Laska; Alan S Gurman; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2013-12-30

5.  Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1997-01

6.  Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: An analysis and application to drug abuse.

Authors:  K G Wilson; S C Hayes
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

Review 7.  Proposed model of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying psychosocial alcohol interventions: the example of motivational interviewing.

Authors:  Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Francesca M Filbey; Christian S Hendershot; Amber D McEachern; Kent E Hutchison
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

Authors:  P Crits-Christoph; L Siqueland; J Blaine; A Frank; L Luborsky; L S Onken; L R Muenz; M E Thase; R D Weiss; D R Gastfriend; G E Woody; J P Barber; S F Butler; D Daley; I Salloum; S Bishop; L M Najavits; J Lis; D Mercer; M L Griffin; K Moras; A T Beck
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1999-06

9.  How group factors affect adolescent change talk and substance use outcomes: implications for motivational interviewing training.

Authors:  Karen Chan Osilla; J Alexis Ortiz; Jeremy N V Miles; Eric R Pedersen; Jon M Houck; Elizabeth J D'Amico
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2015-01

10.  The Cocaine Effects Questionnaire for patient populations: development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Damaris J Rohsenow; Alan D Sirota; Rosemarie A Martin; Peter M Monti
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dismantling motivational interviewing: Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment.

Authors:  Jon Morgenstern; Alexis Kuerbis; Jessica Houser; Svetlana Levak; Paul Amrhein; Sijing Shao; James R McKay
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2017-09-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.