Literature DB >> 17975787

Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses.

U Anegg1, J Lindenmann, A Maier, J Smolle, F M Smolle-Jüttner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The microcirculation and oxygen supply at the oesophagogastric anastomosis are crucial factors that influence anastomotic healing after oesophagectomy.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (mean age 61.7 years) underwent gastric transposition via an orthotopic (14) or retrosternal (15) route. Interstitial partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) of the stomach in the anastomotic region was measured during oesophagectomy and in the intensive care unit. Interstitial PO2 values were determined after ligation of the short gastric vessels, after ligation of the left gastric artery, after forming the conduit and after gastric transposition. Postoperative measurements were recorded during endotracheal intubation, while breathing oxygen by mask or through the nose, and while breathing air.
RESULTS: Interstitial PO2 levels were significantly higher before ligation of the left gastric artery than after ligation (mean 76.1 (95 per cent confidence interval 54.9 to 103.1) versus 44.9 (24.6 to 77.1) mmHg; P = 0.001). Levels were also higher following orthotopic transposition compared with the retrosternal route (68.2 (44.0 to 118.8) versus 24.6 (10.7 to 39.4) mmHg; P = 0.001) and during each postoperative measurement period. No differences were found between the various oxygen supply systems.
CONCLUSION: Oxygen supply at the anastomosis of the gastric conduit reaches higher levels after orthotopic than retrosternal gastric transposition. 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17975787     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Lijie Tan; Mingxiang Feng; Yi Zhang; Qun Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Real-time intraoperative detection of tissue hypoxia in gastrointestinal surgery by wireless pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Elliot L Servais; Nabil P Rizk; Luiz Oliveira; Valerie W Rusch; Marom Bikson; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ischemic conditioning shows a time-dependant influence on the fate of the gastric conduit after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Angela C Shore; Beverley Shields; Rakesh Krishnadas; Martin Cooper; Richard G Berrisford; Shahjehan A Wajed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Superior Thoracic Aperture Size is Significantly Associated with Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shinji Mine; Masayuki Watanabe; Akihiko Okamura; Yu Imamura; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Association of level of anastomosis and anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in anterior mediastinal reconstruction.

Authors:  Katsunori Nishikawa; Tetsuji Fujita; Yako Hasegawa; Yujiro Tanaka; Akira Matsumoto; Norio Mitsumori; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.230

6.  Substernal reconstruction following esophagectomy: operation of last resort?

Authors:  Jacob R Moremen; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Karen M Rieger; Thomas J Birdas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Joerg Lindenmann; Nicole Fink-Neuboeck; Christian Porubsky; Melanie Fediuk; Udo Anegg; Peter Kornprat; Maria Smolle; Alfred Maier; Josef Smolle; Freyja Maria Smolle-Juettner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.