Literature DB >> 30225744

Association of level of anastomosis and anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in anterior mediastinal reconstruction.

Katsunori Nishikawa1, Tetsuji Fujita2, Yako Hasegawa2, Yujiro Tanaka2, Akira Matsumoto2, Norio Mitsumori2, Katsuhiko Yanaga2.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate modifiable predisposing factors associated with anastomotic leak in the anterior mediastinal (AM) reconstruction route.
METHODS: We reviewed the data on 154 patients who underwent esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction using the AM route between 2008 and 2016. The data included computed tomography (CT) scans with sagittal reconstruction of the thoracic section. The level of the esophagogastric anastomosis (LEA) and pretracheal distance (PTD) was measured from sagittal reconstructed CT images. Vascularization of the gastric tube was evaluated by postoperative endoscopy. Variables associated with anastomotic leak were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Anastomotic leak developed in 13 patients (8%). The cut-off level at which the anastomosis was less likely to develop a leak, as determined by Chi-square tests, was 1.5 cm for LEA and 1.3 cm for PTD. On univariate analysis, the factors that were significantly associated with the risk of anastomotic leak included diabetes, hand-sewn anastomosis, the LEA ≥ 1.5 cm, and severe mucosal degeneration. On multivariate analysis, diabetes (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.29-17.2), LEA ≥ 1.5 cm (OR 20.1, 95% CI 3.15-128), and severe mucosal degeneration (OR 7.2, 95% CI 1.42-36.8) were found to be statistically significant independent risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Use of the AM route to place the cervical anastomosis within 1.5 cm above the suprasternal notch might avoid excessive pressure on the gastric tube from the surrounding structures, resulting in a reduction in the risk of an anastomotic leak.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Esophagectomy; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225744     DOI: 10.1007/s10388-018-0619-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Esophagus        ISSN: 1612-9059            Impact factor:   4.230


  29 in total

1.  How important is the route of reconstruction after esophagectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  K A Gawad; S B Hosch; D Bumann; M Lübeck; L C Moneke; C Bloechle; W T Knoefel; C Busch; T Küchler; J R Izbicki
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Clinical significance of tissue blood flow during esophagectomy by laser Doppler flowmetry.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; M Niimi; S Kan; T Shatari; H Takami; S Kodaira
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Pernilla Viklund; Mats Lindblad; Ming Lu; Weimin Ye; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Modifications in retrosternal reconstruction after oesophagogastrectomy may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Hong Hu; Ting Ye; Yawei Zhang; Jie Zhang; James D Luketich; Haiquan Chen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Early postoperative endoscopy for targeted management of patients at risks of anastomotic complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Katsunori Nishikawa; Tetsuji Fujita; Masami Yuda; SeRyung Yamamoto; Yujiro Tanaka; Akira Matsumoto; Yuichiro Tanishima; Fumiaki Yano; Norio Mitsumori; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Influence of the route of reconstruction on morbidity, mortality and local recurrence after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Alfred C C Wong; Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Comparison between different reconstruction routes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Zhen Zheng; Shu-Qin Dai; Wei Li; Xun Cao; Xin Wang; Jian-Hua Fu; Peng Lin; Lan-Jun Zhang; Bin Lu; Jun-Ye Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Aortic Calcification Increases the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lucas Goense; Peter S N van Rossum; Teus J Weijs; Marc J van Det; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Misha D Luyer; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Jelle P Ruurda; Ewout A Kouwenhoven
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jörg Zehetner; Steven R DeMeester; Evan T Alicuben; Daniel S Oh; John C Lipham; Jeffrey A Hagen; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgical resections for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Herzberg; Tim Strate; Salman Yousuf Guraya; Human Honarpisheh
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.445

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.