Literature DB >> 19997936

Ischemic conditioning shows a time-dependant influence on the fate of the gastric conduit after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Darmarajah Veeramootoo1, Angela C Shore, Beverley Shields, Rakesh Krishnadas, Martin Cooper, Richard G Berrisford, Shahjehan A Wajed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) is now established as a valid alternative to open surgery for the management of esophagogastric cancers. However, a high incidence of ischemia-related gastric conduit failure (ICF) is observed, which is detrimental to any potential benefits of this approach.
METHODS: Since April 2004, MIO has been the procedure of choice for esophagogastric resection in the authors' unit. Data relating to the surgical technique were collected, with a focus on ischemic conditioning by laparoscopic ligation of the left gastric artery (LIC) 2 weeks or 5 days before resection.
RESULTS: A total of 97 patients underwent a planned MIO. Four in-patient deaths (4.1%) occurred, none of which were conduit related, and overall, 20 patients experienced ICF (20.6%). In four patients, ICF was recognized and dealt with at the initial surgery. The remaining 16 patients experienced this complication postoperatively, with 9 (9.3%) of them requiring further surgery. Of the 97 patients, 55 did not undergo ischemic conditioning, and conduit failure was observed in 11 (20%). Thirty-five patients had LIC at 2 weeks, and 2 (5.7%) experienced ICF. All seven patients (100%) who had LIC at 5 days experienced ICF. Timing of ischemic conditioning (p < 0.0001) had a definite impact on the conduit failure rate, and the benefit of ischemic conditioning at 2 weeks compared with no conditioning neared significance (p = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic failure of the gastric conduit significantly impairs recovery after MIO. Ischemic conditioning 2 weeks before surgery may reduce this complication and allow the benefits of this approach to be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19997936     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0739-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  44 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England.

Authors:  A A Al-Sarira; G David; S Willmott; J P Slavin; M Deakin; D J Corless
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Esophagoplasty with an autogenous tubed gastric flap.

Authors:  T Yamato; Y Hamanaka; S Hirata; K Sakai
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds.

Authors:  S C Dhar; G I Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Ischemic conditioning of the rat stomach: implications for esophageal replacement with stomach.

Authors:  J D Urschel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.888

10.  Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; S A Wajed; D Sanders; M W M Rucklidge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  13 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.

Authors:  Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Angela C Shore; Shahjehan A Wajed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Esophageal replacement following gastric devascularization is safe, feasible, and may decrease anastomotic complications.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; C Kristian Enestvedt; Thai H Pham; James P Dolan; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Clare Taylor; Shahjehan A Wajed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series.

Authors:  L Findlay; C Yao; D H Bennett; R Byrom; N Davies
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Heger; Susanne Blank; Markus K Diener; Alexis Ulrich; Thomas Schmidt; Markus W Büchler; André L Mihaljevic
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evaluation of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for the measurement of ischemic conditioning effects of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hannes Köhler; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Marianne Maktabi; Manuel Barberio; Jonathan Takoh; Nico Holfert; Yusef Moulla; Stefan Niebisch; Michele Diana; Thomas Neumuth; Sebastian M Rabe; Claire Chalopin; Andreas Melzer; Ines Gockel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Vascular anatomy of the stomach related to resection procedures strategy.

Authors:  V Prudius; V Procházka; Z Pavlovský; D Prudius; Z Kala
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Video. Surgical optimisation of the gastric conduit for minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Shahjehan A Wajed; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Angela C Shore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Xuan-Mai T Nguyen; Kevin M Reavis; Christian Elliott; Hossein Masoomi; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  David S Strosberg; Robert E Merritt; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.