Literature DB >> 17970182

Biomechanics of the lumbar spine after dynamic stabilization.

Chiara Maria Bellini1, Fabio Galbusera, Manuela T Raimondi, Giuseppe V Mineo, Marco Brayda-Bruno.   

Abstract

Target of the study was to predict the biomechanics of the instrumented and adjacent levels due to the insertion of the DIAM spinal stabilization system (Medtronic Ltd). For this purpose, a 3-dimensional finite element model of the intact L3/S1 segment was developed and subjected to different loading conditions (flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation). The model was then instrumented at the L4/L5 level and the same loading conditions were reapplied. Within the assumptions of our model, the simulation results suggested that the implant caused a reduction in range of motion of the instrumented level by 17% in flexion and by 43% in extension, whereas at the adjacent levels, no significant changes were predicted. Numerical results in terms of intradiscal pressure, relative to the intact condition, predicted that the intervertebral disc at the instrumented level was unloaded by 27% in flexion, by 51% in extension, and by 6% in axial rotation, while no variations in pressure were caused by the device in lateral bending. At the adjacent levels, a change of relative intradiscal pressure was predicted in extension, both at the L3/L4 level, which resulted unloaded by 26% and at the L5/S1 level, unloaded by 8%. Furthermore, a reduction in terms of principal compressive stress in the annulus fibrosus of the L4/L5 instrumented level was predicted, as compared with the intact condition. These numerical predictions have to be regarded as a theoretical representation of the behavior of the spine, because any finite element model represents only a simplification of the real structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970182     DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0b013e318031af6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  22 in total

1.  Posterior Arch Augmentation (Spinoplasty) before and after Single and Double Interspinous Spacer Introduction at the Same Level: Preventing and Treating the Failure?

Authors:  Luigi Manfré
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  [Long-term results, status of studies and differential indication regarding the DIAM implant].

Authors:  F A Krappel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Survivorship analysis of 150 consecutive patients with DIAM™ implantation for surgery of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation.

Authors:  Yoo-Joon Sur; Chae-Gwan Kong; Jong-Beom Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Porcine models in spinal research: calibration and comparative finite element analysis of various configurations during flexion-extension.

Authors:  Hadi N Aziz; Fabio Galbusera; Chiara Maria Bellini; Giuseppe Vincenzo Mineo; Alessandro Addis; Riccardo Pietrabissa; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Pedicle screw fixation with kyphoplasty decreases the fracture risk of the treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pan Yang; Ying Zhang; Huan-Wen Ding; Jian Liu; Lin-Qiang Ye; Jin Xiao; Qiang Tu; Tao Yang; Fei Wang; Guo-Gang Sun
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-07

7.  Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology.

Authors:  Chen-Sheng Chen; Shih-Liang Shih
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ferdinand Krappel; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Giovanni Alessi; Jean-Michel Remacle; Luis Alberto Lopez; Jesus Javier Fernández; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Kwonsoo Chun; Inchul Yang; Namhoon Kim; Dosang Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-11-30

10.  Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Stefania Vaga; M Brayda-Bruno; F Perona; M Fornari; M T Raimondi; M Petruzzi; G Grava; F Costa; E G Caiani; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.