Literature DB >> 17968020

Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment.

Eva S Thomas1, Henry L Gomez, Rubi K Li, Hyun-Cheol Chung, Luis E Fein, Valorie F Chan, Jacek Jassem, Xavier B Pivot, Judith V Klimovsky, Fernando Hurtado de Mendoza, Binghe Xu, Mario Campone, Guillermo L Lerzo, Ronald A Peck, Pralay Mukhopadhyay, Linda T Vahdat, Henri H Roché.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Effective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. Ixabepilone has single-agent activity in these patients and has demonstrated synergy with capecitabine in this setting. This study was designed to compare ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in anthracycline-pretreated or -resistant and taxane-resistant locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle, or capecitabine alone 2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule, in this international phase III study. The primary end point was progression-free survival evaluated by blinded independent review.
RESULTS: Ixabepilone plus capecitabine prolonged progression-free survival relative to capecitabine (median, 5.8 v 4.2 months), with a 25% reduction in the estimated risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P = .0003). Objective response rate was also increased (35% v 14%; P < .0001). Grade 3/4 treatment-related sensory neuropathy (21% v 0%), fatigue (9% v 3%), and neutropenia (68% v 11%) were more frequent with combination therapy, as was the rate of death as a result of toxicity (3% v 1%, with patients with liver dysfunction [>/= grade 2 liver function tests] at greater risk). Capecitabine-related toxicities were similar for both treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Ixabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrates superior efficacy to capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated or resistant to anthracyclines and resistant to taxanes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17968020     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  125 in total

1.  Randomized phase III trial of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Eduard Vrdoljak; Oliver Rixe; Binghe Xu; Alexey Manikhas; Carlos Medina; Susanne Crocamo Ventilari Da Costa; Jungsil Ro; Gonzalo Rubio; Monica Rondinon; Gumersindo Perez Manga; Ronald Peck; Valerie Poulart; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  US Food and Drug Administration approval overview in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Robert Justice; John Johnson; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Jonathan Krell; Colin R James; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Vivek Misra; Susan Cleator; David Miles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Metastatic breast cancer: The Odyssey of personalization.

Authors:  A Sonnenblick; N Pondé; M Piccart
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Systemic treatment with capecitabine as maintenance therapy in patients with recurring or metastatic breast cancer: experience in the Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center Siglo XXI, Mexican Social Security Institute.

Authors:  Manuel Segura-González; Miguel Quintana-Quintana
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  A phase II clinical trial of ixabepilone (Ixempra; BMS-247550; NSC 710428), an epothilone B analog, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Michael Menefee; Maureen Edgerly; Sen Zhuang; Herb Kotz; Marianne Poruchynsky; Lyn Mickley Huff; Susan Bates; Tito Fojo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Phase II Randomized Study of Ixabepilone Versus Observation in Patients With Significant Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Richardo H Alvarez; Majorie C Green; James L Murray; Vicente Valero; Kimberly B Koenig; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Jennifer K Litton; Lakshmy Nair; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.