PURPOSE: Ixabepilone (Ixempra; BMS-247550) is an epothilone B analog and nontaxane microtubule-stabilizing compound with clinical activity in a range of solid tumors. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had measurable disease and had not received previous cytotoxic or targeted therapy were treated with 6 mg/m(2) ixabepilone i.v. daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Levels of Glu-terminated and acetylated tubulin, markers of microtubule stabilization, were assessed by Western blot. VHL gene mutation status was determined by sequencing. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients received a total of 590 cycles, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-29). The overall response rate was 13% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor). One patient had a complete response, 10 patients had partial responses, and 59 patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 5.5 months. The median overall survival of renal cell carcinoma Motzer grade 0 and 1 patients with clear cell histology was 19.25 months. Treatment-related adverse events were primarily alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicity, neuropathy, and fatigue. Biopsies were done at baseline and after five doses of ixabepilone. Microtubule target engagement was achieved in 84.6% to 92.3% of patients evaluated. No correlation was identified between the target engagement, VHL gene mutation status, and clinical response. CONCLUSION: Ixabepilone can cause tumor regression in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and could be considered in combination regimens with other therapies.
PURPOSE:Ixabepilone (Ixempra; BMS-247550) is an epothilone B analog and nontaxane microtubule-stabilizing compound with clinical activity in a range of solid tumors. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had measurable disease and had not received previous cytotoxic or targeted therapy were treated with 6 mg/m(2) ixabepilone i.v. daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Levels of Glu-terminated and acetylated tubulin, markers of microtubule stabilization, were assessed by Western blot. VHL gene mutation status was determined by sequencing. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients received a total of 590 cycles, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-29). The overall response rate was 13% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor). One patient had a complete response, 10 patients had partial responses, and 59 patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 5.5 months. The median overall survival of renal cell carcinoma Motzer grade 0 and 1 patients with clear cell histology was 19.25 months. Treatment-related adverse events were primarily alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicity, neuropathy, and fatigue. Biopsies were done at baseline and after five doses of ixabepilone. Microtubule target engagement was achieved in 84.6% to 92.3% of patients evaluated. No correlation was identified between the target engagement, VHL gene mutation status, and clinical response. CONCLUSION:Ixabepilone can cause tumor regression in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and could be considered in combination regimens with other therapies.
Authors: H Maier-Lenz; B Hauns; B Haering; J Koetting; K Mross; C Unger; T Bauknecht; A du Bois; H G Meerpohl; N Hollaender; K Diergarten Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Jame Abraham; Manish Agrawal; Susan Bakke; Ann Rutt; Maureen Edgerly; Frank M Balis; Brigitte Widemann; Louis Davis; Bharat Damle; Daryl Sonnichsen; David Lebwohl; Susan Bates; Herb Kotz; Tito Fojo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sen H Zhuang; Y Elizabeth Hung; Laura Hung; Robert W Robey; Dan L Sackett; W Marston Linehan; Susan E Bates; Tito Fojo; Marianne S Poruchynsky Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: W H Wilson; S L Berg; G Bryant; R E Wittes; S Bates; A Fojo; S M Steinberg; B R Goldspiel; J Herdt; J O'Shaughnessy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Henri Roché; Louise Yelle; Francesco Cognetti; Louis Mauriac; Craig Bunnell; Joseph Sparano; Pierre Kerbrat; Jean-Pierre Delord; Linda Vahdat; Ronald Peck; David Lebwohl; Rana Ezzeddine; Hervé Curé Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wilfred D Stein; Hui Huang; Michael Menefee; Maureen Edgerly; Herb Kotz; Andrew Dwyer; James Yang; Susan E Bates Journal: Cancer J Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Wilfred D Stein; Julia Wilkerson; Sindy T Kim; Xin Huang; Robert J Motzer; Antonio Tito Fojo; Susan E Bates Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tyler A Johnson; Johann Sohn; Yvette M Vaske; Kimberly N White; Tanya L Cohen; Helene C Vervoort; Karen Tenney; Frederick A Valeriote; Leonard F Bjeldanes; Phillip Crews Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Che-Kai Tsao; Bobby Liaw; Catherine He; Matthew D Galsky; John Sfakianos; William K Oh Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Christina A von Roemeling; Laura A Marlow; William P Kennedy; Gregory T Kennedy; John A Copland; Michael E Menefee Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Andreas A Argyriou; Athanasios P Kyritsis; Thomas Makatsoris; Haralabos P Kalofonos Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 3.989