Literature DB >> 21203780

Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Orit Freedman1, Eitan Amir, Camilla Zimmermann, Mark Clemons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supportive care interventions can have a substantial impact on side effects of chemotherapy. Consequently, accurate reporting of such interventions is essential when interpreting clinical trial results. This study determined the prevalence and quality of reporting of supportive care treatment for common chemotherapy-induced toxicities in phase III, breast cancer chemotherapy trials.
METHODS: A systematic review of phase III trials of breast cancer trials incorporating chemotherapy published in the last 5 years was undertaken. Trials were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Library. Supportive treatments evaluated were use of antiemetics, colony-stimulating growth factors, and antibiotics. Reporting quality was rated as "good", "fair", "poor", or "absent" using predetermined criteria.
RESULTS: Sixty-two trials met inclusion criteria. In 41 studies (66%), details regarding prophylactic antiemetic treatment were not provided. Growth factor use was not reported in 20 trials (32%). Instructions for the use of prophylactic antibiotics were absent in 45 trials (72%).
CONCLUSION: There are significant deficiencies in reporting of use of prophylactic supportive care agents in breast cancer trials. Omission of supportive care instructions may impact substantially on patient management and health care system expenditure. Recommendations for the type, dose, and frequency of supportive care drugs should be provided and reported on in trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21203780     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-1069-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  79 in total

1.  Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines.

Authors:  K F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Günter Raab; Angelika Caputo; Martin Schütte; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens U Blohmer; Bernd Gerber; Serban D Costa; Elisabeth Merkle; Holger Eidtmann; Dieter Lampe; Christian Jackisch; Andreas du Bois; Manfred Kaufmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathy D Miller; Linnea I Chap; Frankie A Holmes; Melody A Cobleigh; P Kelly Marcom; Louis Fehrenbacher; Maura Dickler; Beth A Overmoyer; James D Reimann; Amy P Sing; Virginia Langmuir; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Toxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC): impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to the TAC regimen.

Authors:  M Martín; A Lluch; M A Seguí; A Ruiz; M Ramos; E Adrover; A Rodríguez-Lescure; R Grosse; L Calvo; C Fernandez-Chacón; M Roset; A Antón; D Isla; P Martínez del Prado; L Iglesias; J Zaluski; A Arcusa; J M López-Vega; M Muñoz; J R Mel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  First-line gemcitabine versus epirubicin in postmenopausal women aged 60 or older with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study.

Authors:  O Feher; P Vodvarka; J Jassem; G Morack; S H Advani; K S Khoo; D C Doval; S Ermisch; D Roychowdhury; M A Miller; G von Minckwitz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Improved outcome from substituting methotrexate with epirubicin: results from a randomised comparison of CMF versus CEF in patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Bent Ejlertsen; Henning T Mouridsen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Jørn Andersen; Søren Cold; Per Edlund; Marianne Ewertz; Brita B Jensen; Claus Kamby; Bo Nordenskjold; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Alan M Keller; Robert G Mennel; Vassilis A Georgoulias; Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Aura Erazo; Anna Lluch; Charles L Vogel; Manfred Kaufmann; Gunther von Minckwitz; I Craig Henderson; Lillian Mellars; Leila Alland; Craig Tendler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M E R O'Brien; N Wigler; M Inbar; R Rosso; E Grischke; A Santoro; R Catane; D G Kieback; P Tomczak; S P Ackland; F Orlandi; L Mellars; L Alland; C Tendler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  G Fountzilas; H P Kalofonos; U Dafni; C Papadimitriou; D Bafaloukos; P Papakostas; A Kalogera-Fountzila; H Gogas; G Aravantinos; L A Moulopoulos; T Economopoulos; D Pectasides; N Maniadakis; V Siafaka; E Briasoulis; C Christodoulou; D Tsavdaridis; P Makrantonakis; E Razis; P Kosmidis; D Skarlos; M A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure.

Authors:  J Bonneterre; H Roché; A Monnier; J P Guastalla; M Namer; P Fargeot; S Assadourian
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Barrier protective use of skin care to prevent chemotherapy-induced cutaneous symptoms and to maintain quality of life in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Johannes Wohlrab; Nikola Bangemann; Anke Kleine-Tebbe; Marc Thill; Sherko Kümmel; Eva-Maria Grischke; Rainer Richter; Sophie Seite; Diana Lüftner
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2014-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.