Bodil E Engelmann1, Annika Loft, Andreas Kjær, Hans J Nielsen, Thomas A Gerds, Eric V Benzon, Nils Brünner, Ib J Christensen, Susanne H Hansson, Niels H Holländer, Michael H Kristensen, Johan Löfgren, Elena Markova, Carsten Sloth, Liselotte Højgaard. 1. Departments of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Clinical Pathology, and Radiology, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Public Health, Core Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Biotech Research and Innovation Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for metastatic colon cancer (mCC) are widening. We prospectively evaluated serial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and measurements of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and liberated domain I of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR(I)) for early assessment of treatment response in mCC patients. METHODS: Thirty-three mCC patients scheduled for first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and bevacizumab participated; 27 were evaluated by PET/CT before treatment, after one and four treatment series. Morphological and metabolic response was independently assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer PET criteria. Plasma TIMP-1, plasma uPAR(I), and serum CEA were determined. RESULTS: Metabolic response after one treatment course predicted the ability of CAPOX and bevacizumab to induce morphological response after four treatment series with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 69%, and odds ratio of 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9; 182). Early metabolically stable or progressive disease was associated with shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.2 [CI 1.3; 7.8]). Biomarker levels at early evaluation were associated with shorter OS (TIMP-1 per unit increase on a log-2-transformed ng/mL scale: HR = 2.6 [CI 1.4; 4.9]; uPAR(I) per 25 fmol/mL increase: HR = 1.5 [CI 1.1; 2.1]). CONCLUSION: This monocentric study demonstrated predictive value of early metabolic PET response and prognostic value of TIMP-1 and uPAR(I) levels in mCC treated with CAPOX and bevacizumab. Results support investigation of PET/CT, TIMP-1, and uPAR(I) guided early treatment adaptation in mCC.
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for metastatic colon cancer (mCC) are widening. We prospectively evaluated serial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and measurements of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and liberated domain I of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR(I)) for early assessment of treatment response in mCC patients. METHODS: Thirty-three mCC patients scheduled for first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and bevacizumab participated; 27 were evaluated by PET/CT before treatment, after one and four treatment series. Morphological and metabolic response was independently assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer PET criteria. Plasma TIMP-1, plasma uPAR(I), and serum CEA were determined. RESULTS: Metabolic response after one treatment course predicted the ability of CAPOX and bevacizumab to induce morphological response after four treatment series with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 69%, and odds ratio of 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9; 182). Early metabolically stable or progressive disease was associated with shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.2 [CI 1.3; 7.8]). Biomarker levels at early evaluation were associated with shorter OS (TIMP-1 per unit increase on a log-2-transformed ng/mL scale: HR = 2.6 [CI 1.4; 4.9]; uPAR(I) per 25 fmol/mL increase: HR = 1.5 [CI 1.1; 2.1]). CONCLUSION: This monocentric study demonstrated predictive value of early metabolic PET response and prognostic value of TIMP-1 and uPAR(I) levels in mCC treated with CAPOX and bevacizumab. Results support investigation of PET/CT, TIMP-1, and uPAR(I) guided early treatment adaptation in mCC.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S Giacchetti; B Perpoint; R Zidani; N Le Bail; R Faggiuolo; C Focan; P Chollet; J F Llory; Y Letourneau; B Coudert; F Bertheaut-Cvitkovic; D Larregain-Fournier; A Le Rol; S Walter; R Adam; J L Misset; F Lévi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Y Douillard; D Cunningham; A D Roth; M Navarro; R D James; P Karasek; P Jandik; T Iveson; J Carmichael; M Alakl; G Gruia; L Awad; P Rougier Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-03-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: David Cunningham; Yves Humblet; Salvatore Siena; David Khayat; Harry Bleiberg; Armando Santoro; Danny Bets; Matthias Mueser; Andreas Harstrick; Chris Verslype; Ian Chau; Eric Van Cutsem Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Dennis Vriens; Anne I J Arens; Martin Hutchings; Wim J G Oyen Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: S De Bruyne; N Van Damme; P Smeets; L Ferdinande; W Ceelen; J Mertens; C Van de Wiele; R Troisi; L Libbrecht; S Laurent; K Geboes; M Peeters Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: M N Holten-Andersen; G Murphy; H J Nielsen; A N Pedersen; I J Christensen; G Høyer-Hansen; N Brünner; R W Stephens Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ronald L Korn; Daniel D Von Hoff; Mitesh J Borad; Markus F Renschler; Desmond McGovern; R Curtis Bay; Ramesh K Ramanathan Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Keith W H Chiu; Ka-On Lam; H An; Gavin T C Cheung; Johnny K S Lau; Tim-Shing Choy; Victor H F Lee Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 4.430