Literature DB >> 17958491

An MEG study of silent meaning.

Liina Pylkkänen1, Brian McElree.   

Abstract

Although research on the neural bases of language has made significant progress on how the brain accesses the meanings of words, our understanding of sentence-level semantic composition remains limited. We studied the magnetoencephalography (MEG) responses elicited by expressions whose meanings involved an element not expressed in the syntax, which enabled us to investigate the brain correlates of semantic composition without confounds from syntactic composition. Sentences such as the author began the book, which asserts that an activity was begun although no activity is mentioned in the syntax, were contrasted with control sentences such as the author wrote the book, which involved no implicit meaning. These conditions were further compared with a semantically anomalous condition (the author disgusted the book). MEG responses to the object noun showed that silent meaning and anomaly are associated with distinct effects, silent meaning, but not anomaly, eliciting increased amplitudes in the anterior midline field (AMF) at 350-450 msec. The AMF was generated in ventromedial prefrontal areas, usually implicated for social cognition and theory of mind. Our results raise the possibility that silent meaning interpretation may share mechanisms with these neighboring domains of cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17958491     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  32 in total

1.  Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening.

Authors:  Jonathan Brennan; Yuval Nir; Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Karsten Steinhauer; John E Drury; Paul Portner; Matthew Walenski; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Complement Coercion in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from a Self-paced Reading Study.

Authors:  Wenting Xue; Meichun Liu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-11-18

4.  The priming of basic combinatory responses in MEG.

Authors:  Esti Blanco-Elorrieta; Victor S Ferreira; Paul Del Prato; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 5.  Towards a new neurobiology of language.

Authors:  David Poeppel; Karen Emmorey; Gregory Hickok; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Neural basis of basic composition: what we have learned from the red-boat studies and their extensions.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Arim Choi; Neil Cohn; Martin Paczynski; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.