Literature DB >> 17957766

Contact rearrangements form coupled networks from local motions in allosteric proteins.

Michael D Daily1, Tarak J Upadhyaya, Jeffrey J Gray.   

Abstract

Allosteric proteins bind an effector molecule at one site resulting in a functional change at a second site. We hypothesize that networks of contacts altered, formed, or broken are a significant contributor to allosteric communication in proteins. In this work, we identify which interactions change significantly between the residue-residue contact networks of two allosteric structures, and then organize these changes into graphs. We perform the analysis on 15 pairs of allosteric structures with effector and substrate each present in at least one of the two structures. Most proteins exhibit large, dense regions of contact rearrangement, and the graphs form connected paths between allosteric effector and substrate sites in five of these proteins. In the remaining 10 proteins, large-scale conformational changes such as rigid-body motions are likely required in addition to contact rearrangement networks to account for substrate-effector communication. On average, clusters which contain at least one substrate or effector molecule comprise 20% of the protein. These allosteric graphs are small worlds; that is, they typically have mean shortest path lengths comparable to those of corresponding random graphs and average clustering coefficients enhanced relative to those of random graphs. The networks capture 60-80% of known allostery-perturbing mutants in three proteins, and the metrics degree and closeness are statistically good discriminators of mutant residues from nonmutant residues within the networks in two of these three proteins. For two proteins, coevolving clusters of residues which have been hypothesized to be allosterically important differ from the regions with the most contact rearrangement. Residues and contacts which modulate normal mode fluctuations also often participate in the contact rearrangement networks. In summary, residue-residue contact rearrangement networks provide useful representations of the portions of allosteric pathways resulting from coupled local motions. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17957766      PMCID: PMC5009369          DOI: 10.1002/prot.21800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  50 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The linkage between protein folding and functional cooperativity: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Irene Luque; Stephanie A Leavitt; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001-10-25

3.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen M Berman; Tammy Battistuz; T N Bhat; Wolfgang F Bluhm; Philip E Bourne; Kyle Burkhardt; Zukang Feng; Gary L Gilliland; Lisa Iype; Shri Jain; Phoebe Fagan; Jessica Marvin; David Padilla; Veerasamy Ravichandran; Bohdan Schneider; Narmada Thanki; Helge Weissig; John D Westbrook; Christine Zardecki
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-05-29

4.  Ligand-dependent dynamics and intramolecular signaling in a PDZ domain.

Authors:  Ernesto J Fuentes; Channing J Der; Andrew L Lee
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs.

Authors:  Ramu Chenna; Hideaki Sugawara; Tadashi Koike; Rodrigo Lopez; Toby J Gibson; Desmond G Higgins; Julie D Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Anatomy of a structural pathway for activation of the catalytic domain of Src kinase Hck.

Authors:  Nilesh K Banavali; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-06-01

7.  Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state.

Authors:  Dror Tobi; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Using networks to identify fine structural differences between functionally distinct protein states.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Reconciling the "old" and "new" views of protein allostery: a molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY).

Authors:  Mark S Formaneck; Liang Ma; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-06-01

10.  Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL-GroES.

Authors:  Chakra Chennubhotla; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  43 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the Escherichia coli NikR protein: equilibrium conformational fluctuations reveal interdomain allosteric communication pathways.

Authors:  Michael J Bradley; Peter T Chivers; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Differences in allosteric communication pipelines in the inactive and active states of a GPCR.

Authors:  Supriyo Bhattacharya; Nagarajan Vaidehi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  NetworkView: 3D display and analysis of protein·RNA interaction networks.

Authors:  John Eargle; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: a novel paradigm of drug discovery: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Peter Csermely; Tamás Korcsmáros; Huba J M Kiss; Gábor London; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  Dynamically Coupled Residues within the SH2 Domain of FYN Are Key to Unlocking Its Activity.

Authors:  Radu Huculeci; Elisa Cilia; Agatha Lyczek; Lieven Buts; Klaartje Houben; Markus A Seeliger; Nico van Nuland; Tom Lenaerts
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Amino acid substitutions in the sugar kinase/hsp70/actin superfamily conserved ATPase core of E. coli glycerol kinase modulate allosteric ligand affinity but do not alter allosteric coupling.

Authors:  Donald W Pettigrew
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Computation of conformational coupling in allosteric proteins.

Authors:  Brian A Kidd; David Baker; Wendy E Thomas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Structure-based predictive models for allosteric hot spots.

Authors:  Omar N A Demerdash; Michael D Daily; Julie C Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Structural and functional roles of coevolved sites in proteins.

Authors:  Saikat Chakrabarti; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Protein allostery, signal transmission and dynamics: a classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Tsai; Antonio Del Sol; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.