Literature DB >> 25028884

Differences in allosteric communication pipelines in the inactive and active states of a GPCR.

Supriyo Bhattacharya1, Nagarajan Vaidehi2.   

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins that allosterically transduce the signal of ligand binding in the extracellular (EC) domain to couple to proteins in the intracellular (IC) domain. However, the complete pathway of allosteric communication from the EC to the IC domain, including the role of individual amino acids in the pathway is not known. Using the correlation in torsion angle movements calculated from microseconds-long molecular-dynamics simulations, we elucidated the allosteric pathways in three different conformational states of β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR): 1), the inverse-agonist-bound inactive state; 2), the agonist-bound intermediate state; and (3), the agonist- and G-protein-bound fully active state. The inactive state is less dynamic compared with the intermediate and active states, showing dense clusters of allosteric pathways (allosteric pipelines) connecting the EC with the IC domain. The allosteric pipelines from the EC domain to the IC domain are weakened in the intermediate state, thus decoupling the EC domain from the IC domain and making the receptor more dynamic compared with the other states. Also, the orthosteric ligand-binding site becomes the initiator region for allosteric communication in the intermediate state. This finding agrees with the paradigm that the nature of the agonist governs the specific signaling state of the receptor. These results provide an understanding of the mechanism of allosteric communication in class A GPCRs. In addition, our analysis shows that mutations that affect the ligand efficacy, but not the binding affinity, are located in the allosteric pipelines. This clarifies the role of such mutations, which has hitherto been unexplained.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25028884      PMCID: PMC4104064          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  60 in total

1.  Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations.

Authors:  Wenjun Zheng; Bernard R Brooks; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Allosteric pathways in imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase.

Authors:  Ivan Rivalta; Mohammad M Sultan; Ning-Shiuan Lee; Gregory A Manley; J Patrick Loria; Victor S Batista
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Beta(1)-selective agonist (-)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenetylamino)-3-(3,4-dihydroxy)-2-propanol [(-)-RO363] differentially interacts with key amino acids responsible for beta(1)-selective binding in resting and active states.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Sugimoto; Reiko Fujisawa; Ryuji Tanimura; Anne Laure Lattion; Susanna Cotecchia; Gozoh Tsujimoto; Taku Nagao; Hitoshi Kurose
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 4.  Emerging opportunities for allosteric modulation of G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Ching-I Anderson Wang; Richard J Lewis
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the rat m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Role of conserved cysteines in receptor function.

Authors:  T M Savarese; C D Wang; C M Fraser
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The conserved seven-transmembrane sequence NP(X)2,3Y of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily regulates multiple properties of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  L S Barak; L Ménard; S S Ferguson; A M Colapietro; M G Caron
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Activation and dynamic network of the M2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; Sara E Nichols; Paul M Gasper; Vincent T Metzger; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structure and dynamics of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Jianxin Hu; Albert C Pan; Daniel H Arlow; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Erica Rosemond; Hillary F Green; Tong Liu; Pil Seok Chae; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw; William I Weis; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Aaron M Ring; Aashish Manglik; Jianxin Hu; Kelly Hu; Katrin Eitel; Harald Hübner; Els Pardon; Celine Valant; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; Christian C Felder; Peter Gmeiner; Jan Steyaert; William I Weis; K Christopher Garcia; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Signal propagation in proteins and relation to equilibrium fluctuations.

Authors:  Chakra Chennubhotla; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  39 in total

1.  Communication over the network of binary switches regulates the activation of A2A adenosine receptor.

Authors:  Yoonji Lee; Sun Choi; Changbong Hyeon
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Investigating Small-Molecule Ligand Binding to G Protein-Coupled Receptors with Biased or Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Kristen A Marino; Marta Filizola
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

3.  Toward high-resolution computational design of the structure and function of helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Patrick Barth; Alessandro Senes
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 4.  Reprogramming cellular functions with engineered membrane proteins.

Authors:  Caroline Arber; Melvin Young; Patrick Barth
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 9.740

5.  Conformational plasticity of the intracellular cavity of GPCR-G-protein complexes leads to G-protein promiscuity and selectivity.

Authors:  Manbir Sandhu; Anja M Touma; Matthew Dysthe; Fredrik Sadler; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan; Nagarajan Vaidehi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Network Re-Wiring During Allostery and Protein-Protein Interactions: A Graph Spectral Approach.

Authors:  Vasundhara Gadiyaram; Anasuya Dighe; Sambit Ghosh; Saraswathi Vishveshwara
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 7.  Detecting Allosteric Networks Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  S Bowerman; J Wereszczynski
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 8.  Allosteric communication pipelines in G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Nagarajan Vaidehi; Supriyo Bhattacharya
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.547

9.  New pipelines for novel allosteric GPCR modulators.

Authors:  R Scott Prosser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Identifying Functional Hotspot Residues for Biased Ligand Design in G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Anita K Nivedha; Christofer S Tautermann; Supriyo Bhattacharya; Sangbae Lee; Paola Casarosa; Ines Kollak; Tobias Kiechle; Nagarajan Vaidehi
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.