INTRODUCTION: We test an array of biopsychosocial, cognitive-behavioral, and work-related factors to identify the best predictors of work disability following a back injury. METHODS: We test the validity of alternative severity measures in predicting the likelihood of four distinct, mutually exclusive patterns of post-injury employment in the first year after onset of back pain. The study sample includes 959 participants in the ASU Healthy Back Study, a prospective cohort study of workers who filed claims for occupational back pain between 1999 and 2002. Self-reported severity measures include: NRS-101 measures of the intensity of back or leg pain, Roland-Morris scale of functional disability, and mental and physical components of the SF-12. RESULTS: All the severity measures have significant predictive power on return-to-work outcomes even after 1 year. Baseline physical functioning and overall mental and physical health status are more predictive of specific patterns of post-injury employment than pain intensity measures, possibly because there is considerable idiosyncratic variation in the pain intensity measures. The mental component of the SF-12, in particular, is relatively robust to alternate specifications, consistently statistically significant, and has the lowest probability significance level in explaining patterns of employment 1 year after injury.
INTRODUCTION: We test an array of biopsychosocial, cognitive-behavioral, and work-related factors to identify the best predictors of work disability following a back injury. METHODS: We test the validity of alternative severity measures in predicting the likelihood of four distinct, mutually exclusive patterns of post-injury employment in the first year after onset of back pain. The study sample includes 959 participants in the ASU Healthy Back Study, a prospective cohort study of workers who filed claims for occupational back pain between 1999 and 2002. Self-reported severity measures include: NRS-101 measures of the intensity of back or leg pain, Roland-Morris scale of functional disability, and mental and physical components of the SF-12. RESULTS: All the severity measures have significant predictive power on return-to-work outcomes even after 1 year. Baseline physical functioning and overall mental and physical health status are more predictive of specific patterns of post-injury employment than pain intensity measures, possibly because there is considerable idiosyncratic variation in the pain intensity measures. The mental component of the SF-12, in particular, is relatively robust to alternate specifications, consistently statistically significant, and has the lowest probability significance level in explaining patterns of employment 1 year after injury.
Authors: Izabela Z Schultz; Joan M Crook; Jonathan Berkowitz; Gregory R Meloche; Ruth Milner; Oonagh A Zuberbier; Wendy Meloche Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Rollin M Gallagher; Virginia Rauh; Larry D Haugh; Raymond Milhous; Peter W Callas; Régis Langelier; Joan M McClallen; John Frymoyer Journal: Pain Date: 1989-10 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: J A Kopec; J M Esdaile; M Abrahamowicz; L Abenhaim; S Wood-Dauphinee; D L Lamping; J I Williams Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1995-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Victoria Sullivan; Maria N Wilson; Douglas P Gross; Ole Kudsk Jensen; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Jill A Hayden Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2022-02-12
Authors: Anne N Nisenzon; Steven Z George; Jason M Beneciuk; Laura D Wandner; Calia Torres; Michael E Robinson Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Ivan A Steenstra; Claire Munhall; Emma Irvin; Nelson Oranye; Steven Passmore; Dwayne Van Eerd; Quenby Mahood; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2017-09