| Literature DB >> 17956601 |
Paal F R Brunsvig1, Anders Andersen, Steinar Aamdal, Vessela Kristensen, Harald Olsen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous pharmacokinetic studies with docetaxel have mostly used 3-weekly (75 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2) or weekly regimens (35-40 mg/m2). The pharmacokinetics and radiosensitizing efficacy of weekly 20 mg/m2 docetaxel, has however not been well characterized. We examined the pharmacokinetics of weekly docetaxel when administered with concurrent radiotherapy and compared the results with a 3-weekly 100 mg/m2 regimen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17956601 PMCID: PMC2175508 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient characteristics
| Number of patients | 15 | 19 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 11 | 7 |
| Female | 4 | 12 |
| Age, years | ||
| Median | 69 | 63 |
| Range | 47–81 | 45–75 |
| Histological type | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 3 | 12 |
| Squamous cell | 9 | 4 |
| Large cell | 1 | 2 |
| Undifferentiated | 2 | 1 |
| Performance status | ||
| ECOG 0 | 6 | 5 |
| ECOG 1 | 7 | 10 |
| ECOG 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Stage | ||
| IIIA | 3 | |
| IIIB | 12 | 4 |
| IV | 15 |
Docetaxel pharmacokinetic parameters in patients treated with 20 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2
| Cmax [nM] | 742 | 389–1294 | 3737 | 2616–6949 |
| AUC0–25 [nMh] | 1284 | 848–1812 | 5562 | 3653–12790 |
| AUC0–72 [nMh] | 1541 | 996–2038 | ND | ND |
| Clearance [L/h/m2] | 19.3 | 14–29 | 22.3 | 10–34 |
| t1/2α [h] | 0.99 | 0.8–2.0 | 0.74 | 0.5–1.0 |
| t1/2β [h] | 12.9 | 9–35 | 18.0 | 9–52 |
| t1/2γ [h] | 27.7 | 14–146 | ND | ND |
| C72h [nM] | 3.0 | 0.7–6.5 | ND | ND |
| AAG [g/L] | 1.6 | 0.7–2.7 | 1.5 | 0.8–2.9 |
*: Each variable was calculated based on 11 to 27 cycles.
Figure 1Elimination curve for patients receiving 20 mg/m2 of docetaxel. Mean values (▼), with error bars representing 1SD. Gray lines represent the extreme values at each time point. Vertical arrows labelled Rad represent the time of radiation treatment.
Intra-individual variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetic parameters in patients treated with 20 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2
| Cmax | 1.06 | 0.4–1.6 | 1.07 | 0.9–1.3 |
| AUC0–25 | 1.12 | 0.6–1.5 | 1.13 | 0.9–1.5 |
| AUC0–72 | 1.12 | 0.8–1.3 | ND | ND |
| Clearance | 0.90 | 0.8–1.7 | 0.89 | 0.8–1.1 |
| t1/2α | 0.94 | 0.4–1.1 | 1.15 | 1.1–1.5 |
| t1/2β | 0.95 | 0.7–1.5 | 1.15 | 0.7–1.4 |
| t1/2γ | 1.03 | 0.7–1.3 | ND | ND |
| C72h | 0.92 | 0.6–2.1 | ND | ND |
| AAG | 0.98 | 0.7–1.7 | 1.15 | 0.9–1.4 |
#: Each variable was calculated based on data from 4 to 10 patients.
Figure 2The relationship between AAG-level and docetaxel AUC for patients receiving 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel (RSQ = 0.64, p < 0.0001).
Figure 3Correlation between AAG and docetaxel AUC. For the 20 mg/m2 docetaxel patients that received two or more cycles, there was a correlation between the change in AAG-level and the change in docetaxel AUC0–25 between the cycles (RSQ = 0.63, p = 0.011).
Figure 4Interpatient variations for two docetaxel dose levels. Plotting the total range (dotted line = median) of docetaxel concentrations at each time point, the graphs for the patients receiving 20 mg/m2 and the patients receiving 100 mg/m2 will overlap at some time points (e.g. at 6 h: low dose range 18–55 nM, high dose range 51–304 nM). For simplicity, the graph shows determinations from 2 to 25 hours.