Literature DB >> 12759775

Analysis of docetaxel pharmacokinetics in humans with the inclusion of later sampling time-points afforded by the use of a sensitive tandem LCMS assay.

Daniel L Gustafson1, Michael E Long, Joseph A Zirrolli, Mark W Duncan, Scott N Holden, A Scott Pierson, S Gail Eckhardt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane derived from the needles of the European yew ( Taxus baccata) and it is an important chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of recurrent ovarian, breast and non-small-cell lung cancers. Traditional dosing regimens with docetaxel involve doses of 60-100 mg/m(2) by infusion every 3 weeks. Now weekly low-dose (30-36 mg/m(2)) regimens are being evaluated in phase I trials. Such low-dose studies require a more sensitive, specific and rapid assay of docetaxel in biological fluids for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters. Because docetaxel is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and is highly protein-bound in the plasma, there is potential for drug-drug interactions and high interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics. Therefore, pharmacokinetic studies are an important component to understanding the therapeutic variability of docetaxel-containing chemotherapeutic regimens.
METHODS: To this end, we developed an analytical assay for docetaxel based upon tandem LCMS and paclitaxel as an internal standard. The sensitivity of the new assay allowed us to monitor plasma levels of docetaxel out to 48 h after the end of the infusion in patients enrolled in a phase I trial of exisulind (orally, twice daily) receiving weekly docetaxel doses of 30 or 36 mg/m(2) where plasma docetaxel levels are below the lower limit of quantitation for traditional HPLC/UV-based assays at later time-points.
RESULTS: The inclusion of the 48-h time-point had significant effects on the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters when using either a three-compartment or non-compartmental analysis. The terminal half-life was significantly increased when the 48-h time-point was included in the pharmacokinetic analysis, and the use of model parameters derived with the inclusion of the 48-h time-point were able to more accurately predict plasma levels at later times.
CONCLUSIONS: The results reflect the importance of accurate and sensitive analytical methods for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters and the effect of this later time-point on docetaxel pharmacokinetic modeling. Further, with the increased use of weekly docetaxel in combination with other agents, the inclusion of these later sampling time-points and sensitive methods for drug level determinations are important components in the description of pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12759775     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-003-0622-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  17 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation and in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) of novel methylene-substituted 3,3' diindolylmethane (DIM).

Authors:  Apurva R Patel; Shawn D Spencer; Mahavir B Chougule; Stephen Safe; Mandip Singh
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Docetaxel Accumulates in Lymphatic Circulation Following Subcutaneous Delivery Compared to Intravenous Delivery in Rats.

Authors:  Deanna R Worley; Ryan J Hansen; Luke A Wittenburg; Laura S Chubb; Daniel L Gustafson
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel : recent developments.

Authors:  Sharyn D Baker; Alex Sparreboom; Jaap Verweij
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pantoprazole Affecting Docetaxel Resistance Pathways via Autophagy (PANDORA): Phase II Trial of High Dose Pantoprazole (Autophagy Inhibitor) with Docetaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC).

Authors:  Aaron R Hansen; Ian F Tannock; Arnoud Templeton; Eric Chen; Andrew Evans; Jennifer Knox; Amy Prawira; Srikala S Sridhar; Susie Tan; Francisco Vera-Badillo; Lisa Wang; Bradly G Wouters; Anthony M Joshua
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-04-05

5.  Incorporation of ABCB1-mediated transport into a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of docetaxel in mice.

Authors:  Susan F Hudachek; Daniel L Gustafson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Highly selective and sensitive assay for paclitaxel accumulation by tumor cells based on selective solid phase extraction and micro-flow liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Julio R Gaspar; Jun Qu; Ninfa L Straubinger; Robert M Straubinger
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Coadministration of lapatinib increases exposure to docetaxel but not doxorubicin in the small intestine of mice.

Authors:  Susan F Hudachek; Daniel L Gustafson
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Ultra-sensitive quantification of paclitaxel using selective solid-phase extraction in conjunction with reversed-phase capillary liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Haoying Yu; Robert M Straubinger; Jin Cao; Hao Wang; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  Management of isolated yew berry toxicity with sodium bicarbonate: a case report in treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Jessica Pierog; Bryan Kane; Kathleen Kane; J Ward Donovan
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-06

10.  A phase I pharmacological and biological study of PI-88 and docetaxel in patients with advanced malignancies.

Authors:  Laura Q M Chow; Daniel L Gustafson; Cindy L O'Bryant; Lia Gore; Michele Basche; Scott N Holden; Mark C Morrow; Stacy Grolnic; Brian R Creese; Kaye L Roberts; Kat Davis; Russell Addison; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.