PURPOSE: Weekly administration of docetaxel has demonstrated comparable efficacy together with a distinct toxicity profile with reduced myelosuppression, although pharmacokinetic data with weekly regimens are lacking. The comparative pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during weekly and once every 3 weeks (3-weekly) administration schedules were evaluated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-six patients received weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) as a 30-min infusion alone (n = 8) or in combination with irinotecan (n = 12), or in 3-weekly regimens, as a 1-h infusion at 60 mg/m(2) with doxorubicin (n = 10), 75 mg/m(2) alone (n = 9), or 100 mg/m(2) alone (n = 7). Serial blood samples were obtained immediately before and up to 21 days after the infusion. Plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed by compartmental modeling. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD docetaxel clearance values were similar with weekly and 3-weekly schedules (25.2 +/- 7.7 versus 23.7 +/- 7.9 liter/h/m(2)); half-lives were also similar with both schedules of administration (16.5 +/- 11.2 versus 17.6 +/- 7.4 h). With extended plasma sampling beyond 24 h post-infusion, docetaxel clearance was 18% lower and the terminal half-life was 5-fold longer. At 35 mg/m(2), the mean +/- SD docetaxel concentration on day 8 was 0.00088 +/- 0.00041 microg/ml (1.08 +/- 0.51 nM) at 75 mg/m(2), concentrations on day 8, 15, and 22 were 0.0014 +/- 0.00043 microg/ml (1.79 +/- 0.53 nM), 0.00067 +/- 0.00025 microg/ml (0.83 +/- 0.31 nM), and 0.00047 +/- 0.00008 microg/ml (0.58 +/- 0.099 nM), respectively. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel pharmacokinetics are similar for the weekly and 3-weekly regimens. Prolonged circulation of low nanomolar concentrations of docetaxel may contribute to the mechanism of action of docetaxel through suppression of microtubule dynamics and tumor angiogenesis and enhanced cell radiosensitivity in combined modality therapy.
PURPOSE: Weekly administration of docetaxel has demonstrated comparable efficacy together with a distinct toxicity profile with reduced myelosuppression, although pharmacokinetic data with weekly regimens are lacking. The comparative pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during weekly and once every 3 weeks (3-weekly) administration schedules were evaluated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-six patients received weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) as a 30-min infusion alone (n = 8) or in combination with irinotecan (n = 12), or in 3-weekly regimens, as a 1-h infusion at 60 mg/m(2) with doxorubicin (n = 10), 75 mg/m(2) alone (n = 9), or 100 mg/m(2) alone (n = 7). Serial blood samples were obtained immediately before and up to 21 days after the infusion. Plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed by compartmental modeling. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD docetaxel clearance values were similar with weekly and 3-weekly schedules (25.2 +/- 7.7 versus 23.7 +/- 7.9 liter/h/m(2)); half-lives were also similar with both schedules of administration (16.5 +/- 11.2 versus 17.6 +/- 7.4 h). With extended plasma sampling beyond 24 h post-infusion, docetaxel clearance was 18% lower and the terminal half-life was 5-fold longer. At 35 mg/m(2), the mean +/- SD docetaxel concentration on day 8 was 0.00088 +/- 0.00041 microg/ml (1.08 +/- 0.51 nM) at 75 mg/m(2), concentrations on day 8, 15, and 22 were 0.0014 +/- 0.00043 microg/ml (1.79 +/- 0.53 nM), 0.00067 +/- 0.00025 microg/ml (0.83 +/- 0.31 nM), and 0.00047 +/- 0.00008 microg/ml (0.58 +/- 0.099 nM), respectively. CONCLUSION:Docetaxel pharmacokinetics are similar for the weekly and 3-weekly regimens. Prolonged circulation of low nanomolar concentrations of docetaxel may contribute to the mechanism of action of docetaxel through suppression of microtubule dynamics and tumor angiogenesis and enhanced cell radiosensitivity in combined modality therapy.
Authors: Min-Young Lee; Ki Sun Jung; Hae Su Kim; Ji Yun Lee; Sung Hee Lim; Moonjin Kim; Hyun Ae Jung; Sung Min Kim; Jong Mu Sun; Myung-Ju Ahn; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Seong Yoon Yi; In Gyu Hwang; Sang-Cheol Lee; Hee Kyung Ahn; Do Hyoung Lim; Soon Il Lee; Keon Woo Park Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Gary Hudes; Scott T Tagawa; Young E Whang; Ming Qi; Xiang Qin; Thomas A Puchalski; Manjula Reddy; Mark Cornfeld; Mario Eisenberger Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: John Kauh; Chantal Chanel-Vos; Daniel Escuin; Michael P Fanucchi; R Donald Harvey; Nabil Saba; Dong M Shin; Anthony Gal; Lin Pan; Michael Kutner; Suresh S Ramalingam; Laura Bender; Adam Marcus; Paraskevi Giannakakou; Fadlo R Khuri Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Roisin M Connolly; Michelle A Rudek; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Stacie C Jeter; Michele G Donehower; Laurie A Wright; Ming Zhao; John H Fetting; Leisha A Emens; Vered Stearns; Nancy E Davidson; Sharyn D Baker; Antonio C Wolff Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Francesco Crea; Maria A Duhagon Serrat; Elaine M Hurt; Suneetha B Thomas; Romano Danesi; William L Farrar Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Kazumasa Komura; Seong Ho Jeong; Kunihiko Hinohara; Fangfang Qu; Xiaodong Wang; Masayuki Hiraki; Haruhito Azuma; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Philip W Kantoff; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Melanie Mediavilla-Varela; Fabio J Pacheco; Frankis Almaguel; Jossymar Perez; Eva Sahakian; Tracy R Daniels; Lai Sum Leoh; Amelia Padilla; Nathan R Wall; Michael B Lilly; Marino De Leon; Carlos A Casiano Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 27.401