Literature DB >> 17955500

Early detection of adverse drug events within population-based health networks: application of sequential testing methods.

Jeffrey S Brown1, Martin Kulldorff, K Arnold Chan, Robert L Davis, David Graham, Parker T Pettus, Susan E Andrade, Marsha A Raebel, Lisa Herrinton, Douglas Roblin, Denise Boudreau, David Smith, Jerry H Gurwitz, Margaret J Gunter, Richard Platt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Active surveillance of population-based health networks may improve the timeliness of detection of adverse drug events (ADEs). Active monitoring requires sequential analysis methods. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate the utility of automated healthcare claims data for near real-time drug adverse event surveillance and (2) identify key methodological issues related to the use of healthcare claims data for real-time drug safety surveillance.
METHODS: We assessed the ability to detect ADEs using historical data from nine health plans involved in the HMO Research Network's Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERT). Analyses were performed using a maximized sequential probability ratio test (maxSPRT). Five drug-event pairs representing known associations with an ADE and two pairs representing 'negative controls' were analyzed.
RESULTS: Statistically significant (p < 0.05) signals of excess risk were found in four of the five drug-event pairs representing known associations; no signals were found for the negative controls. Signals were detected between 13 and 39 months after the start of surveillance. There was substantial variation in the number of exposed and expected events at signal detection.
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective, periodic evaluation of routinely collected data can provide population-based estimates of medication-related adverse event rates to support routine, timely post-marketing surveillance for selected ADEs. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955500     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  35 in total

1.  Early steps in the development of a claims-based targeted healthcare safety monitoring system and application to three empirical examples.

Authors:  Peter M Wahl; Joshua J Gagne; Thomas E Wasser; Debra F Eisenberg; J Keith Rodgers; Gregory W Daniel; Marcus Wilson; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jeremy A Rassen; Amanda R Patrick; Jerry Avorn; Rhonda L Bohn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  A pharmacoepidemiological network model for drug safety surveillance: statins and rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Ben Y Reis; Karen L Olson; Lu Tian; Rhonda L Bohn; John S Brownstein; Peter J Park; Mark J Cziraky; Marcus D Wilson; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Temporal data mining for adverse events following immunization in nationwide Danish healthcare databases.

Authors:  Henrik Svanström; Torbjörn Callréus; Anders Hviid
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Sequence Symmetry Analysis as a Signal Detection Tool for Potential Heart Failure Adverse Events in an Administrative Claims Database.

Authors:  Izyan A Wahab; Nicole L Pratt; Lisa Kalisch Ellett; Elizabeth E Roughead
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Active computerized pharmacovigilance using natural language processing, statistics, and electronic health records: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Wang; George Hripcsak; Marianthi Markatou; Carol Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  A comparison of the empirical performance of methods for a risk identification system.

Authors:  Patrick B Ryan; Paul E Stang; J Marc Overhage; Marc A Suchard; Abraham G Hartzema; William DuMouchel; Christian G Reich; Martijn J Schuemie; David Madigan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Clinical Concept Value Sets and Interoperability in Health Data Analytics.

Authors:  Sigfried Gold; Andrea Batch; Robert McClure; Guoqian Jiang; Hadi Kharrazi; Rishi Saripalle; Vojtech Huser; Chunhua Weng; Nancy Roderer; Ana Szarfman; Niklas Elmqvist; David Gotz
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

8.  Using Multiple Pharmacovigilance Models Improves the Timeliness of Signal Detection in Simulated Prospective Surveillance.

Authors:  Rolina D van Gaalen; Michal Abrahamowicz; David L Buckeridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Combing signals from spontaneous reports and electronic health records for detection of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Rave Harpaz; Santiago Vilar; William Dumouchel; Hojjat Salmasian; Krystl Haerian; Nigam H Shah; Herbert S Chase; Carol Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Comparative analysis of pharmacovigilance methods in the detection of adverse drug reactions using electronic medical records.

Authors:  Mei Liu; Eugenia Renne McPeek Hinz; Michael Edwin Matheny; Joshua C Denny; Jonathan Scott Schildcrout; Randolph A Miller; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.