Literature DB >> 22506565

A pharmacoepidemiological network model for drug safety surveillance: statins and rhabdomyolysis.

Ben Y Reis1, Karen L Olson, Lu Tian, Rhonda L Bohn, John S Brownstein, Peter J Park, Mark J Cziraky, Marcus D Wilson, Kenneth D Mandl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent withdrawals of major drugs have highlighted the critical importance of drug safety surveillance in the postmarketing phase. Limitations of spontaneous report data have led drug safety professionals to pursue alternative postmarketing surveillance approaches based on healthcare administrative claims data. These data are typically analysed by comparing the adverse event rates associated with a drug of interest to those of a single comparable reference drug.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether adverse event detection can be improved by incorporating information from multiple reference drugs. We developed a pharmacological network model that implemented this approach and evaluated its performance.
METHODS: We studied whether adverse event detection can be improved by incorporating information from multiple reference drugs, and describe two approaches for doing so. The first, reported previously, combines a set of related drugs into a single reference cohort. The second is a novel pharmacoepidemiological network model, which integrates multiple pair-wise comparisons across an entire set of related drugs into a unified consensus safety score for each drug. We also implemented a single reference drug approach for comparison with both multi-drug approaches. All approaches were applied within a sequential analysis framework, incorporating new information as it became available and addressing the issue of multiple testing over time. We evaluated all these approaches using statin (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) safety data from a large healthcare insurer in the US covering April 2000 through March 2005.
RESULTS: We found that both multiple reference drug approaches offer earlier detection (6-13 months) than the single reference drug approach, without triggering additional false positives.
CONCLUSIONS: Such combined approaches have the potential to be used with existing healthcare databases to improve the surveillance of therapeutics in the postmarketing phase over single-comparator methods. The proposed network approach also provides an integrated visualization framework enabling decision makers to understand the key high-level safety relationships amongst a group of related drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22506565     DOI: 10.2165/11596610-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  32 in total

Review 1.  Potential for conflict of interest in the evaluation of suspected adverse drug reactions: use of cerivastatin and risk of rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Bruce M Psaty; Curt D Furberg; Wayne A Ray; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  How the US drug safety system should be changed.

Authors:  Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Experts call for active surveillance of drug safety.

Authors:  Meredith Wadman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Early detection of adverse drug events within population-based health networks: application of sequential testing methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Brown; Martin Kulldorff; K Arnold Chan; Robert L Davis; David Graham; Parker T Pettus; Susan E Andrade; Marsha A Raebel; Lisa Herrinton; Douglas Roblin; Denise Boudreau; David Smith; Jerry H Gurwitz; Margaret J Gunter; Richard Platt
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Postmarket "pharmacovigilance" program on alert for adverse events from drugs.

Authors:  Tracy Hampton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Early adverse drug event signal detection within population-based health networks using sequential methods: key methodologic considerations.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Brown; Martin Kulldorff; Kenneth R Petronis; Robert Reynolds; K Arnold Chan; Robert L Davis; David Graham; Susan E Andrade; Marsha A Raebel; Lisa Herrinton; Douglas Roblin; Denise Boudreau; David Smith; Jerry H Gurwitz; Margaret J Gunter; Richard Platt
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial.

Authors:  Robert S Bresalier; Robert S Sandler; Hui Quan; James A Bolognese; Bettina Oxenius; Kevin Horgan; Christopher Lines; Robert Riddell; Dion Morton; Angel Lanas; Marvin A Konstam; John A Baron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Jüni; Linda Nartey; Stephan Reichenbach; Rebekka Sterchi; Paul A Dieppe; Matthias Egger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Dec 4-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs.

Authors:  David J Graham; Judy A Staffa; Deborah Shatin; Susan E Andrade; Stephanie D Schech; Lois La Grenade; Jerry H Gurwitz; K Arnold Chan; Michael J Goodman; Richard Platt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Statin safety: an overview and assessment of the data--2005.

Authors:  Harold Bays
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.