Literature DB >> 17955240

Radiation exposure to surgical staff during F-18-FDG-guided cancer surgery.

P A Andersen1, A H Chakera, T L Klausen, T Binderup, H S Grossjohann, E Friis, C Palnaes Hansen, G Schmidt, A Kjaer, B Hesse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-energy gamma probes have recently become commercially available, developed for (18)F-FDG probe-guided surgery. The radiation received by the staff in the operating room might limit the use of it, but has never been determined. We therefore wanted to measure the absorbed staff doses at operations where patients had received a preoperative injection of (18)F-FDG.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with different cancers (breast cancer, melanoma, gastrointestinal cancers, respectively) were operated. At every operation the surgeon was monitored with a TLD tablet on his finger of the operating hand and a TLD tablet on the abdomen. The surgeon and anaesthesiologist were also monitored using electronic dosimeters placed in the trousers lining at 25 operations.
RESULTS: The dose rate to the surgeon's abdominal wall varied between 7.5-13.2 microSv/h, depending on tumour location. The doses to the anaesthesiologists and the finger doses to the surgeon were much lower. About 350-400 MBq, i.e. ca. eight times higher activities than those used in the present study are supposed to be necessary for guiding surgery. It can be calculated from the body doses measured that a surgeon can perform between 150-260 h of surgery without exceeding permissible limits for professional workers.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiation load to the operating staff will generally be so small that it does not present any limitation for FDG-guided surgery. However, it is recommended to monitor the surgical staff considering that the surgeon may be exposed to other radiation sources, and since the staff often includes women of child-bearing age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955240     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0532-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   10.057


  20 in total

1.  Radiation safety of the sentinel lymph node technique in breast cancer.

Authors:  W A Waddington; M R Keshtgar; I Taylor; S R Lakhani; M D Short; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04

2.  The sentinel node concept in head and neck cancer: solution for the controversies in the N0 neck?

Authors:  Jochen A Werner; Anja A Dünne; Anette Ramaswamy; Carsten Dalchow; Thomas Behr; Roland Moll; Benedikt J Folz; R Kim Davis
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  An intra-operative positron probe with background rejection capability for FDG-guided surgery.

Authors:  Seiichi Yamamoto; Keiichi Matsumoto; Setsu Sakamoto; Kazumasa Tarutani; Kotaro Minato; Michio Senda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 4.  Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1994

5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used.

Authors:  K M McMasters; T M Tuttle; D J Carlson; C M Brown; R D Noyes; R L Glaser; D J Vennekotter; P S Turk; P S Tate; A Sardi; P B Cerrito; M J Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53).

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1998

7.  Application of an [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-sensitive probe for the intraoperative detection of malignancy.

Authors:  R Essner; E C Hsueh; P I Haigh; E C Glass; Y Huynh; F Daghighian
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy results in less postoperative morbidity compared with axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

Authors:  William E Burak; Scott T Hollenbeck; Emmanuel E Zervos; Karen L Hock; Lisa C Kemp; Donn C Young
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  The role of a positron- and high-energy gamma photon probe in intraoperative localization of recurrent melanoma.

Authors:  Benjamin L Franc; Carina Mari; Denise Johnson; Stanley P Leong
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.794

10.  PET-Probe: Evaluation of Technical Performance and Clinical Utility of a Handheld High-Energy Gamma Probe in Oncologic Surgery.

Authors:  Seza A Gulec; Farhad Daghighian; Richard Essner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comprehensive evaluation of occupational radiation exposure to intraoperative and perioperative personnel from 18F-FDG radioguided surgical procedures.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Ismet Sarikaya; William C White; Steven G Marsh; Nathan C Hall; George H Hinkle; Edward W Martin; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 3.  Cerenkov luminescence imaging (CLI) for image-guided cancer surgery.

Authors:  M R Grootendorst; M Cariati; A Kothari; D S Tuch; A Purushotham
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2016-05-24

4.  Intraoperative biophotonic imaging systems for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  Salar Sajedi; Hamid Sabet; Hak Soo Choi
Journal:  Nanophotonics       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.449

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.