Literature DB >> 15084937

Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression for late cardiac-transplant recipients with chronic renal failure.

Jan Groetzner1, Bruno Meiser, Peter Landwehr, Lucia Buehse, Markus Mueller, Ingo Kaczmarek, Michael Vogeser, Sabine Daebritz, Peter Ueberfuhr, Bruno Reichart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-related renal failure is a common problem after cardiac transplantation (HTx). The aim of this study was to introduce a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen to HTx recipients with late posttransplant renal impairment and to evaluate the impact of conversion to this new immunosuppression (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] and sirolimus [Sir]) treatment on renal function. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-one HTx patients (25 men, 6 women; 0.2-14.2 years after transplantation) with CNI-based immunosuppression and a serum creatinine greater than 1.9 mg/dL were included in the study. Creatinine and cystatin levels were monitored to detect renal function. Mean patient age was 50+/-14 (range 19-74) years. Conversion was started with 6 mg Sir, continued with 2 mg, and the dose was adjusted to achieve target trough levels between 8 and 14 ng/mL. MMF was continued with trough level adjusted (1.5-4 microg/mL). Subsequently, the CNIs were tapered down and stopped. Clinical follow-up (first and every 3 months after conversion) included endomyocardial biopsies, echocardiography, and laboratory studies. Survival was 90% after a mean follow-up of 13+/-95 months. No acute rejection episode was detected during the study period. Renal function improved significantly after conversion: creatinine preconversion vs. postconversion: 3.14+/-0.76 mg/dL vs. 2.14+/-0.83 mg/dL, P =0.001. Cystatin preconversion vs. postconversion: 2.95+/-1.06 mg/L vs. 2.02+/-1.1 mg/L, P =0.01. In three patients, hemodialysis therapy was stopped completely after conversion. Graft function remained stable. Fractional shortening preconversion vs. postconversion: 36.9+/-6% vs. 36.4+/-6%. There were no serious adverse events. One patient had to be excluded because of noncompliance.
CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from CNI-based immunosuppression to MMF and Sir in HTx patients with chronic renal failure was safe, preserved graft function, and improved renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084937     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000103740.98095.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  Surgical biology for the clinician: vascular effects of immunosuppression.

Authors:  Elissa Tepperman; Danny Ramzy; Jessica Prodger; Rohit Sheshgiri; Mitesh Badiwala; Heather Ross; Vivek Raoa
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  The challenge of renal function in heart transplant children.

Authors:  Sylvie Di Filippo; Pierre Cochat; André Bozio
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Joshua J Augustine; Kenneth A Bodziak; Donald E Hricik
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors: potential uses and a review of haematological adverse effects.

Authors:  Sofia Sofroniadou; David Goldsmith
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Benefit-risk assessment of sirolimus in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Dirk R J Kuypers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi; Andreas Oliver Zuckermann; Michael Grimm
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Management of the Patient After Heart Transplant.

Authors:  Michael A Mathier; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.