Literature DB >> 17951435

Survival of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in bovine feces on pasture.

Lester W Sinton1, Robin R Braithwaite, Carollyn H Hall, Margaret L Mackenzie.   

Abstract

The survival of enteric bacteria was measured in bovine feces on pasture. In each season, 11 cow pats were prepared from a mixture of fresh dairy cattle feces and sampled for up to 150 days. Four pats were analyzed for Escherichia coli, fecal streptococci, and enterococci, and four inoculated pats were analyzed for Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella enterica. Two pats were placed on drainage collectors, and another pat was fitted with a temperature probe. In the first 1 to 3 weeks, there were increases (up to 1.5 orders of magnitude) in the counts of enterococci (in four seasons), E. coli (three seasons), fecal streptococci (three seasons), and S. enterica (two seasons), but there was no increase in the counts of C. jejuni. Thereafter, the counts decreased, giving an average ranking of the times necessary for 90% inactivation of C. jejuni (6.2 days from deposition) < fecal streptococci (35 days) < S. enterica (38 days) < E. coli (48 days) < enterococci (56 days). The pat temperature probably influenced bacterial growth, but the pattern of increases and decreases was primarily determined by desiccation; growth occurred when the water content was greater than 80%, but at a water content of 70 to 75% counts decreased. E. coli and enterococcus regrowth appeared to result from pat rehydration. Of 20 monthly leaching losses of E. coli, 16 were <10% of the total counts in the pat, and 12 were <1%. Drainage losses of C. jejuni (generally <1%) were detected for only 1 to 2 months. Although enterococci exhibited the best survival rate, higher final counts suggested that E. coli is the more practical indicator of bovine fecal pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17951435      PMCID: PMC2168137          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01620-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  20 in total

1.  Verocytoxigenic Escherichia coli in animal faeces, manures and slurries.

Authors:  G Duffy
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Long-term survival of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26, O111, and O157 in bovine feces.

Authors:  H Fukushima; K Hoshina; M Gomyoda
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Fate of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine feces.

Authors:  G Wang; T Zhao; M P Doyle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The survival characteristics of a non-toxigenic strain of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  D J Bolton; C M Byrne; J J Sheridan; D A McDowell; I S Blair
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 5.  Pathogen survival in swine manure environments and transmission of human enteric illness--a review.

Authors:  Tat Yee Guan; Richard A Holley
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 6.  Survival of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in soil, water and on surfaces.

Authors:  A Maule
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000

7.  Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriophages from waste stabilization pond effluent in fresh and saline waters.

Authors:  Lester W Sinton; Carollyn H Hall; Philippa A Lynch; Robert J Davies-Colley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Analysis of Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival in ovine or bovine manure and manure slurry.

Authors:  I T Kudva; K Blanch; C J Hovde
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Fecal contamination of pastoral wetlands.

Authors:  Robert Collins
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.751

10.  Discrimination among thermophilic Campylobacter species by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 23S rRNA gene fragments.

Authors:  M Eyers; S Chapelle; G Van Camp; H Goossens; R De Wachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  33 in total

1.  Influence of refuse sites on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella serovars in seagulls.

Authors:  Raül Ramos; Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar; Francisco Ramírez; Lluís Jover; Xavier Ruiz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Tracing the Enterococci from Paleozoic Origins to the Hospital.

Authors:  François Lebreton; Abigail L Manson; Jose T Saavedra; Timothy J Straub; Ashlee M Earl; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Microbial safety and sanitary quality of strawberry primary production in Belgium: risk factors for Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli contamination.

Authors:  Stefanie Delbeke; Siele Ceuppens; Claudia Titze Hessel; Irene Castro; Liesbeth Jacxsens; Lieven De Zutter; Mieke Uyttendaele
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Escherichia coli and enterococci are sensitive and reliable indicators for human, livestock and wildlife faecal pollution in alpine mountainous water resources.

Authors:  A H Farnleitner; G Ryzinska-Paier; G H Reischer; M M Burtscher; S Knetsch; A K T Kirschner; T Dirnböck; G Kuschnig; R L Mach; R Sommer
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 6.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Differential decay of enterococci and Escherichia coli originating from two fecal pollution sources.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks; G Shay Fout; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The importance of climatic factors and outliers in predicting regional monthly campylobacteriosis risk in Georgia, USA.

Authors:  J Weisent; W Seaver; A Odoi; B Rohrbach
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.787

9.  Survival of Escherichia coli, Enterococci, and Campylobacter spp. in sheep feces on pastures.

Authors:  Elaine M Moriarty; Margaret L Mackenzie; Naveena Karki; Lester W Sinton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Prolonged survival of Campylobacter species in bovine manure compost.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Tim A McAllister; Francis J Larney; Edward Topp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.