OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore the relationship of workarounds related to the implementation of an electronic medication administration record and medication safety practices in five Midwestern nursing homes. DESIGN: As a part of a larger study, this qualitative evaluation was conducted to identify workarounds associated with the implementation of an electronic medication administration record. Data were collected using multimethods including direct observation, process mapping, key informant interviews, and review of field notes from medication safety team meetings. MEASUREMENTS: Open and axial coding techniques were used to identify and categorize types of workarounds in relation to work flow blocks. RESULTS: Workarounds presented in two distinct patterns, those related to work flow blocks introduced by technology and those related to organizational processes not reengineered to effectively integrate with the technology. Workarounds such as safety alert overrides and shortcuts to documentation resulted from first-order problem solving of immediate blocks. Nursing home staff as individuals frequently used first-order problem solving instead of the more sophisticated second-order problem solving approach used by the medication safety team. CONCLUSION: This study provides important practical examples of how nursing home staff work around work flow blocks encountered during the implementation of technology. Understanding these workarounds as a means of first-order problem solving is an important consideration to understanding risk to medication safety.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore the relationship of workarounds related to the implementation of an electronic medication administration record and medication safety practices in five Midwestern nursing homes. DESIGN: As a part of a larger study, this qualitative evaluation was conducted to identify workarounds associated with the implementation of an electronic medication administration record. Data were collected using multimethods including direct observation, process mapping, key informant interviews, and review of field notes from medication safety team meetings. MEASUREMENTS: Open and axial coding techniques were used to identify and categorize types of workarounds in relation to work flow blocks. RESULTS: Workarounds presented in two distinct patterns, those related to work flow blocks introduced by technology and those related to organizational processes not reengineered to effectively integrate with the technology. Workarounds such as safety alert overrides and shortcuts to documentation resulted from first-order problem solving of immediate blocks. Nursing home staff as individuals frequently used first-order problem solving instead of the more sophisticated second-order problem solving approach used by the medication safety team. CONCLUSION: This study provides important practical examples of how nursing home staff work around work flow blocks encountered during the implementation of technology. Understanding these workarounds as a means of first-order problem solving is an important consideration to understanding risk to medication safety.
Authors: Joan S Ash; Paul N Gorman; Mary Lavelle; Thomas H Payne; Thomas A Massaro; Gerri L Frantz; Jason A Lyman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; James Judge; Paula Rochon; Leslie R Harrold; Cynthia Cadoret; Monica Lee; Kathleen White; Jane LaPrino; Janet Erramuspe-Mainard; Martin DeFlorio; Linda Gavendo; Jill Auger; David W Bates Journal: Am J Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: E J Thomas; D M Studdert; H R Burstin; E J Orav; T Zeena; E J Williams; K M Howard; P C Weiler; T A Brennan Journal: Med Care Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-10-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gregory L Alexander; Riley Harrell; Sue Shumate; Mason Rothert; Amy Vogelsmeier; Lori Popejoy; Marilyn Rantz Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2021-01-25
Authors: Mindy E Flanagan; Jason J Saleem; Laura G Millitello; Alissa L Russ; Bradley N Doebbeling Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Pia Andersen; Anne-Mette Lindgaard; Mirela Prgomet; Nerida Creswick; Johanna I Westbrook Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 5.428