IMPORTANCE: Although febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients with solid tumors, little is known about the use of guideline-based care. OBJECTIVES: To examine compliance with guideline-based recommendations for FN treatment, explore the factors that influence adherence to consensus guidelines, and analyze how the use of guideline-based care affects the outcomes. DESIGN: The Perspective database was used to examine the treatment of cancer patients with FN from January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2010. To capture initial decision making, we examined treatment within 48 hours of hospital admission. We determined use of guideline-based antibiotics and nonguideline-based treatments, vancomycin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF). Hierarchical models were developed to examine the factors associated with treatment. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups, and the effect of the initial treatment on outcome (nonroutine hospital discharge and death) was examined. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five thousand two hundred thirty-one patients with solid tumors hospitalized for neutropenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Use of guideline-based antibiotics, vancomycin, and GCSF and their affect on outcome. RESULTS: Among 25 231 patients admitted with FN, guideline-based antibiotics were administered to 79%, vancomycin to 37%, and GCSF to 63%. Patients treated at high FN-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81) by high FN-volume physicians (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.38) and patients managed by hospitalists (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88) were more likely to receive guideline-based antibiotics (P < .05). Vancomycin use increased from 17% in 2000 to 55% in 2010, while GCSF use only decreased from 73% to 55%. Among low-risk patients with FN, prompt initiation of guideline-based antibiotics decreased discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92) and death (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While use of guideline-based antibiotics is high, use of the nonguideline-based treatments, vancomycin, and GCSF is also high. Physician and hospital factors are the strongest predictors of both guideline- and nonguideline-based treatment.
IMPORTANCE: Although febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients with solid tumors, little is known about the use of guideline-based care. OBJECTIVES: To examine compliance with guideline-based recommendations for FN treatment, explore the factors that influence adherence to consensus guidelines, and analyze how the use of guideline-based care affects the outcomes. DESIGN: The Perspective database was used to examine the treatment of cancerpatients with FN from January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2010. To capture initial decision making, we examined treatment within 48 hours of hospital admission. We determined use of guideline-based antibiotics and nonguideline-based treatments, vancomycin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF). Hierarchical models were developed to examine the factors associated with treatment. Patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups, and the effect of the initial treatment on outcome (nonroutine hospital discharge and death) was examined. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five thousand two hundred thirty-one patients with solid tumors hospitalized for neutropenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Use of guideline-based antibiotics, vancomycin, and GCSF and their affect on outcome. RESULTS: Among 25 231 patients admitted with FN, guideline-based antibiotics were administered to 79%, vancomycin to 37%, and GCSF to 63%. Patients treated at high FN-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81) by high FN-volume physicians (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.38) and patients managed by hospitalists (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88) were more likely to receive guideline-based antibiotics (P < .05). Vancomycin use increased from 17% in 2000 to 55% in 2010, while GCSF use only decreased from 73% to 55%. Among low-risk patients with FN, prompt initiation of guideline-based antibiotics decreased discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92) and death (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While use of guideline-based antibiotics is high, use of the nonguideline-based treatments, vancomycin, and GCSF is also high. Physician and hospital factors are the strongest predictors of both guideline- and nonguideline-based treatment.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T Berghmans; M Paesmans; J J Lafitte; C Mascaux; A P Meert; C Jacquy; A Burniat; E Steels; F Vallot; J P Sculier Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2001-11-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alison G Freifeld; Eric J Bow; Kent A Sepkowitz; Michael J Boeckh; James I Ito; Craig A Mullen; Issam I Raad; Kenneth V Rolston; Jo-Anne H Young; John R Wingard Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Nils Kucher; Sophia Koo; Rene Quiroz; Joshua M Cooper; Marilyn D Paterno; Boris Soukonnikov; Samuel Z Goldhaber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Vellenga; C A Uyl-de Groot; R de Wit; H J Keizer; B Löwenberg; M A ten Haaft; T J de Witte; C A Verhagen; G J Stoter; F F Rutten; N H Mulder; W M Smid; E G de Vries Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Zainab Siddiq; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Ana I Tergas; Cassandra Duffy; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-07-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Donna L Buono; Jim C Hu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Jason D Wright; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ling Chen; Alfred I Neugut; Catherine A Richards; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Ravi K Goyal; Spiros Tzivelekis; Kenneth J Rothman; Sean D Candrilli; James A Kaye Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: John C O'Horo; Jasmine R Marcelin; Omar M Abu Saleh; Amelia K Barwise; Patricia M Odean; Christina G Rivera; Aaron J Tande; John W Wilson; Douglas R Osmon; Pritish K Tosh Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Lara Yoon; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Ling Chen; Jim C Hu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Zhu Cui; Jason D Wright; Melissa K Accordino; Donna Buono; Alfred I Neugut; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Sheena Mukkada; Cristel Kate Smith; Delta Aguilar; April Sykes; Li Tang; Mae Dolendo; Miguela A Caniza Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 3.167