Literature DB >> 17941961

Impact of a CT colonography screening program on endoscopic colonoscopy in clinical practice.

Darren C Schwartz1, Kevin J Dasher, Adnan Said, Deepak V Gopal, Mark Reichelderfer, David H Kim, Perry J Pickhardt, Andrew J Taylor, Patrick R Pfau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The potential effect of CT colonography (CTC) on endoscopic colonoscopy (EC) has been the topic of much speculation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a CTC screening program on colonoscopy in clinical practice.
METHODS: At our institution a third-party reimbursed CTC colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was established in 2004. The number of CTC monthly exams performed, monthly EC total and screening exams performed, EC with polypectomy performed, and the number of referrals for EC screening exams requested were prospectively examined in the first 33 months after introduction of a CTC CRC screening program.
RESULTS: The mean number of overall (378.5 vs 413.1) and screening (150.7 vs 162.9) colonoscopy exams performed per month did not change significantly after screening CTC was introduced. The mean number of monthly CTC exams performed rose significantly throughout the first year of the study from 39 initially to a peak of 147.6 cases per month but decreased slightly to 114.3 monthly exams at the end of 2006. A mean 10.0 patients per month were sent for EC after a positive CTC exam. The mean number of monthly colonoscopies with polypectomy remained constant after the introduction of CTC (197.0 vs 180.2). Monthly referrals for screening EC exams initially decreased but were unchanged 3 yr after institution of a CTC screening program (255.0 vs 253.5).
CONCLUSIONS: (a) In our tertiary care center the initiation of a screening CTC program did not result in a decrease in the number of total colonoscopy exams, screening colonoscopy exams performed, nor requests for screening colonoscopy. (b) Only a small number of CTC exams were referred for EC with polypectomy, therefore a CTC screening program may not increase the overall number of therapeutic colonoscopies performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17941961     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01586.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  11 in total

1.  Re: Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Katrina Armstrong; Peter Groeneveld
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Computed tomographic colonography: hope or hype?

Authors:  Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  CT colonography: Friend or foe of practicing endoscopists.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; Ruth Carlos; James Scheiman; Grace H Elta; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 5.  Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Optical colonoscopy and virtual colonoscopy numbers after initiation of a CT colonography program: long term data.

Authors:  Mark Benson; Jeff Pier; Sally Kraft; David Kim; Perry Pickhardt; Jennifer Weiss; Deepak Gopal; Mark Reichelderfer; Patrick Pfau
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.008

8.  Predictors of CT colonography utilization among asymptomatic medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Michael Harhay; Anna Lev-Toaff; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Joshua Bakke; James L Patrick; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-01

10.  Computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Virendra Tewari; Deepali Tewari; Frank G Gress
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.