Literature DB >> 17938887

Heparinized solution vs. saline solution in the maintenance of arterial catheters: a double blind randomized clinical trial.

Mercedes Del Cotillo1, Núria Grané, Maria Llavoré, Salvador Quintana.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to analyze the effectiveness of heparinized solution vs. saline solution for the maintenance of arterial catheters and to detect changes in the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and platelet count in the samples extracted from both groups of arterial catheters.
DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: Intensive Care Unit of a third-level hospital in Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients were included in the trial. The selection criteria were: adults, informed consent, not receiving either full-dose anticoagulant or fibrinolytic treatment, and no thrombocytopenia.
INTERVENTIONS: Sixty-five patients received heparinized solution (1 IU/ml) and 68 received saline solution. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial catheter functionality was compared in the groups every 8 h and at catheter removal. Patency, reliability of arterial pressure, and curve quality were used to evaluate the functionality of the catheters. Blood was drawn, discarding 7.5 ml, from the arterial catheter and from the venouscatheter simultaneously for coagulation tests.
RESULTS: The median duration of catheters being in place was 5.1 days (IQR = 8.1) in the heparin group, and 5.4 (IQR = 7.3) in the saline group (p = 0.7). Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences between groups (p = 0.6). The number of manipulations required to maintain the patency of the arterial catheters was 35% vs. 40% (p = 0.5). The heparin group had a significantly longer aPTT (2.1 +/- .3 vs. 1.25 +/- 0.3, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of heparinized solution for arterial catheter maintenance doesnot appear to be justified. It did not increase the duration of the catheters, nor did it improve their functionality significantly. On the other hand, heparin Na altered aPTT significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938887     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0886-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  18 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring arterial blood pressure: what you may not know.

Authors:  Beate H McGhee; Elizabeth J Bridges
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Patency of arterial catheters with heparinized solutions versus non-heparinized solutions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer L Lapum
Journal:  Can J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2006

3.  Comparison of normal or heparinised saline flushing on function of arterial lines.

Authors:  Rob K S Whitta; Kelly F M Hall; Trish M Bennetts; Lorraine Welman; Peter Rawlins
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Comparison of the patency of arterial lines maintained with heparinized and nonheparinized infusions. The Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Nursing Research Committee of St. Luke's Hospital.

Authors:  M L Hook; J Reuling; M L Luettgen; S O Norris; C C Elsesser; M K Leonard
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Significant increase of activated partial thromboplastin time by heparinization of the radial artery catheter flush solution with a closed arterial catheter system.

Authors:  Eric A J Hoste; Nathalie R A Roels; Johan M A Decruyenaere; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  A comparison of the efficacy of heparinized and nonheparinized solutions for maintenance of perioperative radial arterial catheter patency and subsequent occlusion.

Authors:  Binnur E Tuncali; Buhar Kuvaki; Bahattin Tuncali; Emine Capar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Are coagulation studies on blood sampled from arterial lines valid?

Authors:  M J Heap; S A Ridley; K Hodson; F J Martos
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 8.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: recognition, treatment, and prevention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Theodore E Warkentin; Andreas Greinacher
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Can we rely on arterial line sampling in performing activated plasma thromboplastin time after cardiac surgery?

Authors:  A Alzetani; H A Vohra; R L Patel
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Thrombosis and hemorrhage in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  Jos P J Wester; Fred J L M Haas; Douwe H Biesma; J A Leusink; Gerda Veth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  12 in total

1.  Skin necrosis in patients with arterial catheters flushed with a solution containing heparin.

Authors:  Henry Thomas Stelfox; Barry Kushner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Finding a solution: Heparinised saline versus normal saline in the maintenance of invasive arterial lines in intensive care.

Authors:  Matthew Everson; Lucy Webber; Chris Penfold; Sanjoy Shah; Dan Freshwater-Turner
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2016-06-21

Review 3.  Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Briz; Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Juan B Cabello; Sylvia Bort-Martí; Rafael Carbonell Sanchis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Impact of intravascular thrombosis on failure of radial arterial catheters in critically ill patients: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Yvan Fleury; Diego Arroyo; Caroline Couchepin; Helia Robert-Ebadi; Marc Righini; Johannes A Lobrinus; Bara Ricou; Nathalie Delieuvin Schmitt; Angèle Gayet-Ageron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Heparin versus normal saline for patency of arterial lines.

Authors:  Suzanne Robertson-Malt; Greg N Malt; Vincent Farquhar; William Greer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-13

6.  Avoiding Heparinization of Arterial Line and Maintaining Acceptable Arterial Waveform After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Azin Alizadehasl; Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Mohammadmehdi Peighambari; Rasoul Azarfarin; Ghodrat Golbargian; Hooman Bakhshandeh
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-08-01

7.  Heparinized and Saline Solutions in the Maintenance of Arterial and Central Venous Catheters After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Azin Alizadehasl; Nahid Aghdaii; Ali Sadeghi; Rasoul Azarfarin; Gholamreza Masoumi; Ghodrat Golbargian
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-08-22

8.  Tissue plasminogen activator versus heparin for locking dialysis catheters: A systematic review.

Authors:  Belal M Firwana; Rim Hasan; Mazen Ferwana; Joseph Varon; Aaron Stern; Umesh Gidwani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2011-10

Review 9.  Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Briz; Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Juan B Cabello; Sylvia Bort-Martí; Rafael Carbonell Sanchis; Amanda Burls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-30

10.  Heparin compared with normal saline to maintain patency of permanent double lumen hemodialysis catheters: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ali Akbar Beigi; Mirhadi Seyed HadiZadeh; Fereshteh Salimi; Hafez Ghaheri
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.