M F Bakker1, J W G Jacobs, S M M Verstappen, J W J Bijlsma. 1. University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, F02.127, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.f.bakker-4@umcutrecht.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of the new concept of tight control in randomised trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tight control is a treatment strategy tailored to the individual patient with RA, which aims to achieve a predefined level of low disease activity or remission within a certain period of time. METHODS: The literature database PubMed was searched and yielded four trials: the FIN-RACo trial, the TICORA study, the BeSt study and the CAMERA study. RESULTS: Tight control resulted in greater improvement and a higher percentage of patients meeting the preset aim of low disease activity or remission when compared to the control intervention. In the FIN-RACo trial, analysing the subset of patients completing the study, 68% in the tight control group achieved remission (DAS28<2.6) verus 41% in the contrast group [corrected] In the TICORA study, 65% of patients in the tight control group versus 16% of the contrast group achieved remission, based on DAS<1.6 (p<0.0001). In the CAMERA study, 50% of patients in the tight control group using a computer decision model achieved remission, versus 37% in the contrast group (p = 0.029). The BeSt study consisted of only tight control groups aimed at a DAS<1.6; remission was achieved in 38-46% of patients. This is higher than the range of remission in earlier trials of 13-36%. CONCLUSION: Tight control aiming for low disease activity or even better still, remission, seems a promising option in treating patients with RA in clinical trials and probably also in daily practice.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of the new concept of tight control in randomised trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tight control is a treatment strategy tailored to the individual patient with RA, which aims to achieve a predefined level of low disease activity or remission within a certain period of time. METHODS: The literature database PubMed was searched and yielded four trials: the FIN-RACo trial, the TICORA study, the BeSt study and the CAMERA study. RESULTS: Tight control resulted in greater improvement and a higher percentage of patients meeting the preset aim of low disease activity or remission when compared to the control intervention. In the FIN-RACo trial, analysing the subset of patients completing the study, 68% in the tight control group achieved remission (DAS28<2.6) verus 41% in the contrast group [corrected] In the TICORA study, 65% of patients in the tight control group versus 16% of the contrast group achieved remission, based on DAS<1.6 (p<0.0001). In the CAMERA study, 50% of patients in the tight control group using a computer decision model achieved remission, versus 37% in the contrast group (p = 0.029). The BeSt study consisted of only tight control groups aimed at a DAS<1.6; remission was achieved in 38-46% of patients. This is higher than the range of remission in earlier trials of 13-36%. CONCLUSION: Tight control aiming for low disease activity or even better still, remission, seems a promising option in treating patients with RA in clinical trials and probably also in daily practice.
Authors: Désirée van der Heijde; Lars Klareskog; Vicente Rodriguez-Valverde; Catalin Codreanu; Horatiu Bolosiu; Jose Melo-Gomes; Jesus Tornero-Molina; Joseph Wajdula; Ronald Pedersen; Saeed Fatenejad Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2006-04
Authors: Esmeralda T H Molenaar; Alexandre E Voskuyl; Huib J Dinant; P Dick Bezemer; Maarten Boers; Ben A C Dijkmans Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-01
Authors: Jie Zhang; Ying Shan; George Reed; Joel Kremer; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Scott Baumgartner; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: L T C van Hulst; W Kievit; R van Bommel; P L C M van Riel; L Fraenkel Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Juan José de Agustín; Alba Erra; Andrés Ponce; Carmen Moragues; Cesar Díaz-Torné; Delia Reina; Estefanía Moreno; Julio Ramírez; Lourdes Mateo; Manel Pujol Busquets; Patricia Moya; Pilar Santo-Panero; Sergi Ros-Expósito; Javier Narváez; Raimon Sanmartí; Mª Jesús García de Yébenes; Loreto Carmona Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Susanne J J Claessen; Johanna M W Hazes; Margriet A M Huisman; Derkjen van Zeben; Jolanda J Luime; Angelique E A M Weel Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 2.362