Literature DB >> 28258474

Impact of ultrasonography on treatment decision in rheumatoid arthritis: the IMPULSAR study.

Cèsar Díaz-Torné1, Carme Moragues2, Elide Toniolo2, Carme Geli2, Iván Castellví2, Patricia Moya2, Ignasi Gich2, Josep M Llobet2.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography (US) has shown to be more sensitive than physical examination for diagnosis and assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is also a useful approach for accurate monitoring and intensive treatment adjustment. However, there is limited information concerning the impact of US on therapeutic decision-making in routine daily practice. A single-center cross-sectional study in routine daily practice was conducted to determine the percentage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in which treatment decision was modified on the basis of results of musculoskeletal ultrasonography. All consecutive patients with RA visited for the control of their disease between September and November 2014 were included. Patients were visited by their attending rheumatologist, who made a therapeutic decision according to the results of physical examination and laboratory tests. Thereafter, a musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) was performed by an independent expert sonographer. According to US findings, a change in therapeutic decision was considered, and categorized as 'negative' (maintenance of the therapeutic attitude) or 'positive' (intensification or reduction of treatment). A total of 78 patients (83% women, mean age 63.3 years) were included. In 29 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5-48.9], a change in the therapeutic decision was made, which included intensification of treatment in 18 (62.1%) and reduction of treatment in 11 (37.9%). Change of treatment was more frequent in patients with intermediate disease activity (low and moderate) than in those in clinical remission or with high activity (41.4 vs. 25%), in men than in women (53.8 vs. 33.8%), and in the presence than in the absence of bone erosions (43.6 vs. 21.7%), although differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that in patients with RA, joint US is a relevant complementary tool for treatment decisions in daily practice, particularly in patients with intermediate disease activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antirheumatic agents; Arthritis; Rheumatoid/drug therapy; Rheumatoid/ultrasonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258474     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-017-3689-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  23 in total

Review 1.  Emerging role of ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: optimizing diagnosis, measuring disease activity and identifying prognostic factors.

Authors:  Alvin F Wells; Richard H Haddad
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Marcin Szkudlarek; Michel Court-Payen; Søren Jacobsen; Mette Klarlund; Henrik S Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-04

3.  A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry.

Authors:  Lydia G Schipper; Marloes Vermeer; Hillechiena H Kuper; Monique O Hoekstra; Cees J Haagsma; Alfons A Den Broeder; Piet van Riel; Jaap Fransen; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Szkudlarek; M Court-Payen; C Strandberg; M Klarlund; T Klausen; M Ostergaard
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-09

Review 5.  Summary Findings of a Systematic Literature Review of the Ultrasound Assessment of Bone Erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Marcin Szkudlarek; Lene Terslev; Richard J Wakefield; Marina Backhaus; Peter V Balint; George A W Bruyn; Emilio Filippucci; Frederique Gandjbakhch; Annamaria Iagnocco; Peter Mandl; Ingrid Möller; Esperanza Naredo; Wolfgang A Schmidt; Maria Antonietta d'Agostino
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Variability in the frequency of rheumatology consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.

Authors:  R Lopez-Gonzalez; D Seoane-Mato; S Perez-Vicente; M A Martin-Martinez; F Sanchez-Alonso; L Silva-Fernandez
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Esperanza Naredo; Manuel Rodríguez; Cristina Campos; José Manuel Rodríguez-Heredia; Julio A Medina; Emilio Giner; Olga Martínez; Francisco Javier Toyos; Teresa Ruíz; Inmaculada Ros; Manuel Pujol; Xavier Miquel; Luz García; Juan José Aznar; Eugenio Chamizo; Manuel Páez; Pilar Morales; Amalia Rueda; Roser Tuneu; Hector Corominas; Juan José de Agustín; Carmen Moragues; Dolores Mínguez; Alfredo Willisch; Isabel González-Cruz; Angel Aragón; Gerardo Iglesias; Carlos Armas; Juan Pablo Valdazo; Carmen Vargas; Jaime Calvo-Alén; Antonio Juan-Mas; Georgina Salvador; Angels Puigdollers; Eva Galíndez; Noemi Garrido; José Salaberri; Enrique Raya; Meritxell Salles; César Díaz; José Luis Cuadra; Jesús Garrido
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-04-15

Review 8.  2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Kenneth G Saag; S Louis Bridges; Elie A Akl; Raveendhara R Bannuru; Matthew C Sullivan; Elizaveta Vaysbrot; Christine McNaughton; Mikala Osani; Robert H Shmerling; Jeffrey R Curtis; Daniel E Furst; Deborah Parks; Arthur Kavanaugh; James O'Dell; Charles King; Amye Leong; Eric L Matteson; John T Schousboe; Barbara Drevlow; Seth Ginsberg; James Grober; E William St Clair; Elizabeth Tindall; Amy S Miller; Timothy McAlindon
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 10.995

9.  Treating to the target of remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is cost-effective: results of the DREAM registry.

Authors:  Marloes Vermeer; Wietske Kievit; Hillechiena H Kuper; Louise M A Braakman-Jansen; Hein J Bernelot Moens; Theo R Zijlstra; Alfons A den Broeder; Piet L C M van Riel; Jaap Fransen; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years.

Authors:  Jamie J Kirkham; Maarten Boers; Peter Tugwell; Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound of sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marwin Gutierrez; Sheila Rodriguez; Carina Soto-Fajardo; Pedro Santos-Moreno; Hugo Sandoval; Chiara Bertolazzi; Carlos Pineda
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Ultrasound in sacroiliitis: the picture is shaping up.

Authors:  Marwin Gutierrez; Carlos Pineda
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  The rheumatoid hand in the light of fluorescence: a diagnostic technique of the future?

Authors:  Paweł Żuchowski; Marzena Waszczak-Jeka; Szymon Kudlicki; Sławomir Jeka
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2019-02-28

4.  The added value of musculoskeletal ultrasound to clinical evaluation in the treatment decision of rheumatoid arthritis outpatients: physician experience matters.

Authors:  C Sifuentes-Cantú; I Contreras-Yáñez; L Saldarriaga; A C Lozada; M Gutiérrez; V Pascual-Ramos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.