Literature DB >> 17929695

The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cuing.

Stefan Van der Stigchel1, Jan Theeuwes.   

Abstract

In a standard Posner paradigm, participants were endogenously cued to attend to a peripheral location in visual space without making eye movements. They responded faster to target letters presented at cued than at uncued locations. On some trials, instead of a manual response, they had to move their eyes to a location in space. Results showed that the eyes deviated away from the validly cued location; when the cue was invalid and attention had to be allocated to the uncued location, eye movements also deviated away, but now from the uncued location. The extent to which the eyes deviated from cued and uncued locations was related to the dynamics of attention allocation. We hypothesized that this deviation was due to the successful inhibition of the attended location. The results imply that the oculomotor system is not only involved during the endogenous direction of covert attention to a cued location, but also when covert attention is directed to an uncued location. It appears that the oculomotor system is activated wherever spatial attention is allocated. The strength of saccade deviation might turn out to be an important measure for the amount of attention allocated to any particular location over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929695     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order sequential probabilities.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09-15

2.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The impact of bilingual environments on selective attention in infancy.

Authors:  Kyle J Comishen; Ellen Bialystok; Scott A Adler
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-01-30

4.  Object width modulates object-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Joseph C Nah; Marco Neppi-Modona; Lars Strother; Marlene Behrmann; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Attentional avoidance of threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-11

6.  Pre-cueing, Perceptual Learning and Cognitive Penetration.

Authors:  Dimitria Electra Gatzia; Berit Brogaard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 7.  Associations and Dissociations between Oculomotor Readiness and Covert Attention.

Authors:  Soazig Casteau; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07

8.  Comparing oculomotor efficiency and visual attention between drivers and non-drivers through the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test: A visual-verbal test.

Authors:  Andrés Gené-Sampedro; Francisco Alonso; Celia Sánchez-Ramos; Sergio A Useche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test.

Authors:  Andrés Gené-Sampedro; Pedro Miguel Lourenço Monteiro; Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno; Javier Gene-Morales; David P Piñero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Roopali Bhatnagar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.