Literature DB >> 17924818

Lifting the curtain on the Wizard of Oz: biased voice-based impressions of speaker size.

Drew Rendall1, John R Vokey, Christie Nemeth.   

Abstract

The consistent, but often wrong, impressions people form of the size of unseen speakers are not random but rather point to a consistent misattribution bias, one that the advertising, broadcasting, and entertainment industries also routinely exploit. The authors report 3 experiments examining the perceptual basis of this bias. The results indicate that, under controlled experimental conditions, listeners can make relative size distinctions between male speakers using reliable cues carried in voice formant frequencies (resonant frequencies, or timbre) but that this ability can be perturbed by discordant voice fundamental frequency (F-sub-0, or pitch) differences between speakers. The authors introduce 3 accounts for the perceptual pull that voice F-sub-0 can exert on our routine (mis)attributions of speaker size and consider the role that voice F-sub-0 plays in additional voice-based attributions that may or may not be reliable but that have clear size connotations. (c) 2007 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924818     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies.

Authors:  David A Puts; Coren L Apicella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies are honest signals of threat potential in peripubertal males.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Michael Gurven; David A Puts; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Three-month-old human infants use vocal cues of body size.

Authors:  David Pietraszewski; Annie E Wertz; Gregory A Bryant; Karen Wynn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Gregory A Bryant; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby; Daniel Sznycer; Christopher von Rueden; Andre Krauss; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Body height, immunity, facial and vocal attractiveness in young men.

Authors:  Ilona Skrinda; Tatjana Krama; Sanita Kecko; Fhionna R Moore; Ants Kaasik; Laila Meija; Vilnis Lietuvietis; Markus J Rantala; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-10-18

6.  How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?

Authors:  Leslie M Doll; Alexander K Hill; Michelle A Rotella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas; Lisa L M Welling; John R Wheatley; David A Puts
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-06

7.  Can blind persons accurately assess body size from the voice?

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Agnieszka Sorokowska
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Intrasexual selection drives sensitivity to pitch, formants and duration in the competitive calls of fallow bucks.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pitcher; Elodie F Briefer; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size.

Authors:  Andrey Anikin; Katarzyna Pisanski; Mathilde Massenet; David Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness.

Authors:  Molly Babel; Grant McGuire; Joseph King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.