Literature DB >> 1792460

Methods for dose finding studies in cancer clinical trials: a review and results of a Monte Carlo study.

J O'Quigley1, S Chevret.   

Abstract

We discuss some of the statistical approaches to the design and analysis of phase I clinical trials in cancer. An attempt is made to identify the issues, particular to this type of trial, that should be addressed by an appropriate methodology. A brief review of schemes currently in use is provided together with our views of the extent to which any particular scheme addresses the main issues. Some simulations are provided together with graphical illustration of the operating characteristics of the particular methods. It appears that the continual reassessment method is preferable to other contending schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1792460     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780101104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  19 in total

1.  Dose finding for continuous and ordinal outcomes with a monotone objective function: a unified approach.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Se Hee Kim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  Stochastic approximation with virtual observations for dose-finding on discrete levels.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 4.  Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

5.  Phase I dose escalation clinical trial of phenylbutyrate sodium administered twice daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Luis H Camacho; Jon Olson; William P Tong; Charles W Young; David R Spriggs; Mark G Malkin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Adaptive Phase I clinical trial design using Markov models for conditional probability of toxicity.

Authors:  Laura L Fernandes; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan Murray
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 8.  Prospective clinical trials of brain tumor therapy: the critical role of neurosurgeons.

Authors:  Frederick F Lang; Anthony Asher
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal topotecan.

Authors:  S C Plaxe; R D Christen; J O'Quigley; P S Braly; J L Freddo; E McClay; D Heath; S B Howell
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  An approach for dose finding of drugs in infants: sedation by midazolam studied using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  E Fabre; S Chevret; J F Piechaud; E Rey; F Vauzelle-Kervoedan; P D'Athis; G Olive; G Pons
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.