OBJECTIVE: To characterise the interactions between tacrolimus and antiretroviral drug combinations in hepatitis C virus-HIV co-infected patients who had received a liver transplant. DESIGN: An observational, open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, one-sequence design clinical trial in which patients received tacrolimus as an immunosuppressive therapy during the postoperative period and then had an antiretroviral drug regimen added. Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics were evaluated at steady state during these two periods. METHODS: Fourteen patients participated in the study and seven participated in the intensified pharmacokinetic protocol. Patients were included if they had undergone liver transplantation for end-stage chronic hepatitis C, absence of opportunistic infection, a CD4 cell count of >150 cells/microL and an undetectable HIV plasma viral load (<50 copies/mL) under highly active antiretroviral therapy. During the posttransplantation period, the tacrolimus dose was adjusted according to blood concentrations. When liver function and the tacrolimus dose were stable, antiretroviral therapy was reintroduced. RESULTS: When lopinavir/ritonavir were added to the tacrolimus regimen (seven patients), the tacrolimus dose was reduced by 99% to maintain the tacrolimus concentration within the therapeutic range. Only two patients were treated with nelfinavir, which led to a wide variation in inhibition of tacrolimus metabolism. When efavirenz (four patients) or a nucleoside analogue combination (one patient) was added, very little change in tacrolimus dosing was required. CONCLUSION: The lopinavir/ritonavir combination markedly inhibited tacrolimus metabolism, whereas the effect of efavirenz was small. Tacrolimus dosing must be optimised according to therapeutic drug monitoring and the antiretroviral drug combination.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the interactions between tacrolimus and antiretroviral drug combinations in hepatitis C virus-HIV co-infectedpatients who had received a liver transplant. DESIGN: An observational, open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, one-sequence design clinical trial in which patients received tacrolimus as an immunosuppressive therapy during the postoperative period and then had an antiretroviral drug regimen added. Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics were evaluated at steady state during these two periods. METHODS: Fourteen patients participated in the study and seven participated in the intensified pharmacokinetic protocol. Patients were included if they had undergone liver transplantation for end-stage chronic hepatitis C, absence of opportunistic infection, a CD4 cell count of >150 cells/microL and an undetectable HIV plasma viral load (<50 copies/mL) under highly active antiretroviral therapy. During the posttransplantation period, the tacrolimus dose was adjusted according to blood concentrations. When liver function and the tacrolimus dose were stable, antiretroviral therapy was reintroduced. RESULTS: When lopinavir/ritonavir were added to the tacrolimus regimen (seven patients), the tacrolimus dose was reduced by 99% to maintain the tacrolimus concentration within the therapeutic range. Only two patients were treated with nelfinavir, which led to a wide variation in inhibition of tacrolimus metabolism. When efavirenz (four patients) or a nucleoside analogue combination (one patient) was added, very little change in tacrolimus dosing was required. CONCLUSION: The lopinavir/ritonavir combination markedly inhibited tacrolimus metabolism, whereas the effect of efavirenz was small. Tacrolimus dosing must be optimised according to therapeutic drug monitoring and the antiretroviral drug combination.
Authors: R Venkataramanan; L M Shaw; L Sarkozi; R Mullins; J Pirsch; G MacFarlane; D Scheller; D Ersfeld; M Frick; W E Fitzsimmons; M Virji; A Jain; K L Brayman; A Shaked Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Ashokkumar B Jain; Raman Venkataramanan; Bijan Eghtesad; Amadeo Marcos; Margaret Ragni; Ron Shapiro; Ann B Rafail; John J Fung Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Markus Bickel; Evrim Anadol; Martin Vogel; Wolf Peter Hofmann; Nils von Hentig; Johannes Kuetscher; Michael Kurowski; Christian Moench; Tessa Lennemann; Thomas Lutz; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Hans Reinhard Brodt; Jürgen Rockstroh Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Lynda A Frassetto; Clara C Tan-Tam; Burc Barin; Matt Browne; Alan R Wolfe; Peter G Stock; Michelle Roland; Leslie Z Benet Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Gregory M Lucas; Michael J Ross; Peter G Stock; Michael G Shlipak; Christina M Wyatt; Samir K Gupta; Mohamed G Atta; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Paul A Pham; Leslie A Bruggeman; Jeffrey L Lennox; Patricio E Ray; Robert C Kalayjian Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 9.079