Literature DB >> 17922345

Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids.

Gitte Keidser1, Lyndal Carter, Josef Chalupper, Harvey Dillon.   

Abstract

When the frequency range over which vent-transmitted sound dominates amplification increases, the potential benefit from directional microphones and noise reduction decreases. Fitted with clinically appropriate vent sizes, 23 aided listeners with varying low-frequency hearing thresholds evaluated six schemes comprising three levels of gain at 250 Hz (0, 6, and 12 dB) combined with two features (directional microphone and noise reduction) enabled or disabled in the field. The low-frequency gain was 0 dB for vent-dominated sound, while the higher gains were achieved by amplifier-dominated sounds. A majority of listeners preferred 0-dB gain at 250 Hz and the features enabled. While the amount of low-frequency gain had no significant effect on speech recognition in noise or horizontal localization, speech recognition and front/back discrimination were significantly improved when the features were enabled, even when vent-transmitted sound dominated the low frequencies. The clinical implication is that there is no need to increase low-frequency gain to compensate for vent effects to achieve benefit from directionality and noise reduction over a wider frequency range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922345     DOI: 10.1080/14992020701481698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  [(Air-conduction) Hearing aids-indication, designs and applications : Signal processing and importance of individual fitting].

Authors:  Hendrik Husstedt; Rainer Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 1.330

Review 2.  Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Richard A Roberts; Gina Angley; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  A multicenter trial of an assess-and-fit hearing aid service using open canal fittings and comply ear tips.

Authors:  Pauline Smith; Angela Mack; Adrian Davis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

Review 4.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

Review 5.  Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.

Authors:  Alexandra Winkler; Matthias Latzel; Inga Holube
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Towards Auditory Profile-Based Hearing-Aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation.

Authors:  Raul Sanchez-Lopez; Michal Fereczkowski; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-01-16

7.  Reduction of the occlusion effect induced by earplugs using quasi perfect broadband absorption.

Authors:  Kévin Carillo; Franck Sgard; Olivier Dazel; Olivier Doutres
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.