Literature DB >> 17922246

Interhemisphere differences during tasks involving attention and selection of lateralized stimuli.

I N Baranov-Krylov1, V T Shuvaev, I E Kanunikov.   

Abstract

The state of cortical activation in the parietal and temporal areas of the right and left hemispheres was evaluated using evoked potentials (EP) during tasks consisting of selection of visual stimuli lateralized in the right and left visual fields and needing three different types of attention: to stimulus shape, to stimulus position, and simultaneously to stimulus shape and position. EP were recorded in 15 young healthy experimental subjects using six cortical leads: P3, P4, T3, T4, T5, and T6; the following endogenous EP components (in standard terminology) were analyzed: contingent negative variation (CNV), N1, P3, and the N1-P3 complex. Asymmetry in evoked potentials was assessed in terms of differences to contra-and ipsilateral stimuli in the right and left hemispheres. EP asymmetry was detected in the right hemisphere in all types of selection of lateralized stimuli. The magnitude of asymmetry in the right hemisphere depended on the level (or intensity) of attention: the degree of asymmetry increased with increases in the need for attention to analyze the stimuli. There was a significant relationship between the magnitude of asymmetry and the latent periods of the subjects' responses. The functional significance of these data demonstrating asymmetry may be that it provides better spatial differentiation of visual signals in the right hemisphere, along with dominance of the right hemisphere in attention tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922246     DOI: 10.1007/s11055-007-0086-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0097-0549


  21 in total

1.  Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET.

Authors:  E Macaluso; C Frith; J Driver
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Interhemispheric differences in extrastriate areas during visuo-spatial selective attention.

Authors:  E Macaluso; C Frith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls.

Authors:  D R Gitelman; A C Nobre; T B Parrish; K S LaBar; Y H Kim; J R Meyer; M Mesulam
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  [Changes in evoked potentials depending on attention level in performance of visual tasks].

Authors:  I N Baranov-Krylov; V T Shuvaev; D N Berlov
Journal:  Fiziol Cheloveka       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

5.  [Characteristics of the parietal cortex activation in humans during different attention tasks].

Authors:  I N Baranov-Krylov; V T Shuvaev; I E Kanunikov
Journal:  Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova       Date:  2006-02

Review 6.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  [Asymmetry of visual perception].

Authors:  E A Kostandov; T N Reshchikova; G S Shostakovich; O A Genkina
Journal:  Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova       Date:  1977 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.437

8.  Parietal association cortex in the primate: sensory mechanisms and behavioral modulations.

Authors:  D L Robinson; M E Goldberg; G B Stanton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  A C Nobre; G N Sebestyen; D R Gitelman; M M Mesulam; R S Frackowiak; C D Frith
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.

Authors:  Anika Maraj; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Auditory P3 in antidepressant pharmacotherapy treatment responders, non-responders and controls.

Authors:  Natalia Jaworska; Elisea De Somma; Claude Blondeau; Pierre Tessier; Sandhaya Norris; Wendy Fusee; Dylan Smith; Pierre Blier; Verner Knott
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.