BACKGROUND: The contribution of physician and organizational factors to visit length, quality, and satisfaction remains uncertain, in part, because of confounding by patient presentation. OBJECTIVE: To determine associations among visit length, quality, and satisfaction when patient presentation is controlled. DESIGN: A factorial experiment using standardized patients to make primary care visits presenting with either major depression or adjustment disorder, and a musculoskeletal complaint. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians, each seeing 2 standardized patients. MEASUREMENTS: Visit length was determined from surreptitiously obtained audiorecordings. Other key measures were derived from physician and standardized patient report. RESULTS: Mean visit length for 294 completed encounters was 22.3 minutes (range = 5.8-72.2, SD = 9.4). Key factors associated with visit length were: physician style (rho = 0.68 and 0.54 after multivariate adjustment), nonprofessional experience with depression (11% longer, 95% CI = 0-23%), practicing within an HMO (26% shorter, 95% CI = 61-90%), and greater practice volume (those working >9 half-day clinic sessions/week had 15% shorter visits than those working fewer than 6, 95% CI = 0-27%, and those seeing >12 patients/half-day had 27% shorter visits than those seeing <10 patients/half-day, 95% CI = 13-39%). Suicidal inquiry (a process-based quality-of-care measure for depression) was not associated with adjusted visit length. Satisfaction was linearly associated with visit length but not with suicide inquiry or follow-up interval. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experimental control for clinical presentation, wide variation in visit length persists, largely reflecting individual physician styles. Visit length is a significant determinant of standardized patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: The contribution of physician and organizational factors to visit length, quality, and satisfaction remains uncertain, in part, because of confounding by patient presentation. OBJECTIVE: To determine associations among visit length, quality, and satisfaction when patient presentation is controlled. DESIGN: A factorial experiment using standardized patients to make primary care visits presenting with either major depression or adjustment disorder, and a musculoskeletal complaint. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians, each seeing 2 standardized patients. MEASUREMENTS: Visit length was determined from surreptitiously obtained audiorecordings. Other key measures were derived from physician and standardized patient report. RESULTS: Mean visit length for 294 completed encounters was 22.3 minutes (range = 5.8-72.2, SD = 9.4). Key factors associated with visit length were: physician style (rho = 0.68 and 0.54 after multivariate adjustment), nonprofessional experience with depression (11% longer, 95% CI = 0-23%), practicing within an HMO (26% shorter, 95% CI = 61-90%), and greater practice volume (those working >9 half-day clinic sessions/week had 15% shorter visits than those working fewer than 6, 95% CI = 0-27%, and those seeing >12 patients/half-day had 27% shorter visits than those seeing <10 patients/half-day, 95% CI = 13-39%). Suicidal inquiry (a process-based quality-of-care measure for depression) was not associated with adjusted visit length. Satisfaction was linearly associated with visit length but not with suicide inquiry or follow-up interval. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experimental control for clinical presentation, wide variation in visit length persists, largely reflecting individual physician styles. Visit length is a significant determinant of standardized patient satisfaction.
Authors: Rajesh Balkrishnan; Mark A Hall; Don Mehrabi; G John Chen; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein; Mitchell D Feldman; Carol E Franz; Rahman Azari; Michael S Wilkes; Ladson Hinton; Peter Franks Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-04-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Pamela W Lee; John W Williams; Allen J Dietrich Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Debra L Roter; Rachel L Johnson; Daniel E Ford; Donald M Steinwachs; Neil R Powe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mark Linzer; Asaf Bitton; Shin-Ping Tu; Margaret Plews-Ogan; Karen R Horowitz; Mark D Schwartz; Sara Poplau; Anuradha Paranjape; Michael Landry; Stewart Babbott; Tracie Collins; T Shawn Caudill; Arti Prasad; Allen Adolphe; David E Kern; KoKo Aung; Katherine Bensching; Kathleen Fairfield Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Wylie Burke; Julie Culver; Linda Pinsky; Sarah Hall; Susan E Reynolds; Yutaka Yasui; Nancy Press Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Steven D Vannoy; Tonya Fancher; Caitlyn Meltvedt; Jürgen Unützer; Paul Duberstein; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jennifer Dahne; Amy E Wahlquist; Amy S Boatright; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Douglas O Fleming; Robert Davis; Brent Egan; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.226