Literature DB >> 12202329

Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries.

Myriam Deveugele1, Anselm Derese, Atie van den Brink-Muinen, Jozien Bensing, Jan De Maeseneer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare determinants of consultation length discussed in the literature with those found in consultations with general practitioners from different European countries; to explore the determinants of consultation length, particularly the effect of doctors' and patients' perceptions of psychosocial aspects.
DESIGN: Analysis of videotaped consultations of general practitioners from the Eurocommunication study and of questionnaires completed by doctors and by patients.
SETTING: General practices in six European countries. PARTICIPANTS: 190 general practitioners and 3674 patients.
RESULTS: In a multilevel analysis with three levels (country, general practitioner, and patient), country and doctor variables contributed a similar amount to the total variance in consultation length (23% and 22%, respectively) and patient variables accounted for 55% of the variance. The variables used in the multilevel analysis explained 25% of the total variation. The country in which the doctor practised, combined with the doctors' variables, was as important for the variance in consultation length as the variation between patients. Consultations in which psychosocial problems were considered important by the doctor and the patient lasted longer than consultations about biomedical problems only. The doctor's perception had more influence in this situation than the patient's. Consultation length is influenced by the patients' sex (women got longer consultations), whether the practice was urban or rural, the number of new problems discussed in the consultation (the more problems the longer the consultation), and the patient's age (the older the patient the longer the consultation). As a doctor's workload increased, the length of consultations decreased. The general practitioner's sex or age and patient's level of education were not related to the length of consultation.
CONCLUSION: Consultation length is determined by variables related to the doctor and the doctor's country as well as by those related to patients. Women consulting in an urban practice with problems perceived as psychosocial have longer consultations than other patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202329      PMCID: PMC119444          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

Review 1.  Consultation length in general practice: a review.

Authors:  A Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  How can good general practitioner care be achieved?

Authors:  D C Morrell; M O Roland
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-01-17

3.  Detection of psychologic complaints by general practitioners.

Authors:  P F Verhaak
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Consultation length and outcome in two group general practices.

Authors:  D Hughes
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1983-03

5.  Does awareness of being video recorded affect doctors' consultation behaviour?

Authors:  M Pringle; C Stewart-Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  A survey of the management of psychosocial illness in general practice in Manchester.

Authors:  C R Whitehouse
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-03

7.  The effect of the doctor's sex on the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  J Gray
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1982-03

8.  Sex differences in patients' and physicians' communication during primary care medical visits.

Authors:  D Roter; M Lipkin; A Korsgaard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The importance of list size and consultation length as factors in general practice.

Authors:  R Knight
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-01

10.  Quality and the use of time in general practice: widening the discussion.

Authors:  J G Howie; A M Porter; J F Forbes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-15
View more
  134 in total

1.  What do physicians dislike about managed care? Evidence from a choice experiment.

Authors:  Maurus Rischatsch; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-06-21

2.  On time.

Authors:  Richard Stevens; Ann Mountford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Barriers to nonpharmacologic treatments for stress, anxiety, and insomnia: family physicians' attitudes toward benzodiazepine prescribing.

Authors:  Sibyl Anthierens; Inge Pasteels; Hilde Habraken; Pascale Steinberg; Tom Declercq; Thierry Christiaens
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  [Prerequisites for a new health care model for elderly people with multiple morbidities: results and conclusions from 3 years of research in the PRISCUS consortium].

Authors:  U Thiem; T Hinrichs; C A Müller; S Holt-Noreiks; A Nagl; C Bucchi; U Trampisch; A Moschny; P Platen; E Penner; U Junius-Walker; E Hummers-Pradier; G Theile; S Schmiedl; P A Thürmann; S Scholz; W Greiner; R Klaassen-Mielke; L Pientka; H J Trampisch
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Predictors and outcomes of feeling of insufficient consultation time in cancer care in Korea: results of a nationwide multicenter survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jae-Hyun Park; Eun-Jung Shim; Myung-Il Hahm; Jong-Hyock Park; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Why research in family medicine? A superfluous question.

Authors:  Jan M De Maeseneer; An De Sutter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Doctor-patient communication. Time to talk.

Authors:  Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Claude Richard
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Patients' engagement in primary care: powerlessness and compounding jeopardy. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nicolette F Sheridan; Timothy W Kenealy; Jacquie D Kidd; Jacqueline I G Schmidt-Busby; Jennifer E Hand; Deborah L Raphael; Ann M McKillop; Harold H Rea
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Monique Heijmans; Jany Rademakers; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  The workload of GPs: consultations of patients with psychological and somatic problems compared.

Authors:  Else M Zantinge; Peter F M Verhaak; Jan J Kerssens; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.