Literature DB >> 17920353

18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Einat Even-Sapir1, Eyal Mishani, Gideon Flusser, Ur Metser.   

Abstract

(18)F-Fluoride is a positron-emitting bone-seeking agent, the uptake of which reflects blood flow and remodeling of bone. Assessment of (18)F-fluoride kinetics using quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) methods allows the regional characterization of lesions of metabolic bone diseases and the monitoring of their response to therapy. It also enables the assessment of bone viability and discrimination of uneventful and impaired healing processes of fractures, bone grafts and osteonecrosis. Taking advantage of the favorable pharmacokinetic properties of the tracer combined with the high performance of PET technology, static (18)F-fluoride PET is a highly sensitive imaging modality for detection of benign and malignant osseous abnormalities. Although (18)F-fluoride uptake mechanism corresponds to osteoblastic activity, it is also sensitive for detection of lytic and early marrow-based metastases, by identifying their accompanying reactive osteoblastic changes, even when minimal. The instant fusion of increased (18)F-fluoride uptake with morphological data of computed tomography (CT) using hybrid PET/CT systems improves the specificity of (18)F-fluoride PET in cancer patients by accurately differentiating between benign and malignant sites of uptake. The results of a few recent publications suggest that (18)F-fluoride PET/CT is a valuable modality in the diagnosis of pathological osseous conditions in patients also referred for nononcologic indications. (18)F-fluoride PET and PET/CT are, however, not widely used in clinical practice. The limited availability of (18)F-fluoride and of PET and PET/CT systems is a major factor. At present, there are not enough data on the cost-effectiveness of (18)F-fluoride PET/CT. However, it has been stated by some experts that (18)F-fluoride PET/CT is expected to replace (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920353     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  52 in total

Review 1.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Microfluidics for positron emission tomography probe development.

Authors:  Ming-Wei Wang; Wei-Yu Lin; Kan Liu; Michael Masterman-Smith; Clifton Kwang-Fu Shen
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Impact of Anatomic Location of Bone Metastases on Prognosis in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alison R Roth; Stephanie A Harmon; Timothy G Perk; Jens Eickhoff; Peter L Choyke; Karen A Kurdziel; William L Dahut; Andrea B Apolo; Michael J Morris; Scott B Perlman; Glenn Liu; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT: a response based on actual data from prospective studies.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Camila Mosci; David W Dick; Mike Sathekge; Paula Lapa; Joao M de Lima; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Synthesis of [18F]BODIPY: bifunctional reporter for hybrid optical/positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  J Adam Hendricks; Edmund J Keliher; Dongpeng Wan; Scott A Hilderbrand; Ralph Weissleder; Ralph Mazitschek
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Evaluation of bone viability in patients after girdlestone arthroplasty: comparison of bone SPECT/CT and MRI.

Authors:  G Diederichs; P Hoppe; F Collettini; G Wassilew; B Hamm; W Brenner; M R Makowski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Quantitative analysis of 18F-NaF dynamic PET/CT cannot differentiate malignant from benign lesions in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Jens Hillengass; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Hoda Anwar; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Treatment response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; J Hillengass; H Goldschmidt; B Wagner; U Haberkorn; K Kopka; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Emerging role of integrated PET-MRI in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Amarnath Jena; Sangeeta Taneja; Prerana Rana; Nidhi Goyal; Abhishek Vaish; Rajesh Botchu; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.