PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a correction strategy for prostate rotation using gantry and collimator angle adjustments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Gantry and collimator angle adjustments were used to correct for prostate rotation without rotating the table. A formula to partially correct for left-right (LR) rotations was derived through geometric analysis of rotation-induced clinical target volume (CTV) beam's-eye-view shape changes. For 10 prostate patients, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with different margins were created. Simulating CTV LR rotation and correcting each beam by a collimator rotation, the corrected CTV dose was compared with the original and uncorrected dose. Effects of residual geometric uncertainties were assessed using a Monte Carlo technique. A large number of treatments representative for prostate patients were simulated. Dose probability histograms of the minimum CTV dose (D min) were derived, with and without online correction, resulting in a more realistic margin estimate. RESULTS: Dosimetric analysis of all IMRT plans showed that, with rotational correction and a 2-mm margin, D min was constant to within 3% for LR rotations up to +/-15 degrees . The Monte Carlo dose probability histograms showed that, with correction, a margin of 4 mm ensured that 90% of patients received a D min >or=95% of the prescribed dose. Without correction a margin of 6 mm was required. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and tested a practical method for (online) correction of prostate rotation, allowing safe and straightforward implementation of margin reduction and dose escalation.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a correction strategy for prostate rotation using gantry and collimator angle adjustments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Gantry and collimator angle adjustments were used to correct for prostate rotation without rotating the table. A formula to partially correct for left-right (LR) rotations was derived through geometric analysis of rotation-induced clinical target volume (CTV) beam's-eye-view shape changes. For 10 prostatepatients, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with different margins were created. Simulating CTV LR rotation and correcting each beam by a collimator rotation, the corrected CTV dose was compared with the original and uncorrected dose. Effects of residual geometric uncertainties were assessed using a Monte Carlo technique. A large number of treatments representative for prostatepatients were simulated. Dose probability histograms of the minimum CTV dose (D min) were derived, with and without online correction, resulting in a more realistic margin estimate. RESULTS: Dosimetric analysis of all IMRT plans showed that, with rotational correction and a 2-mm margin, D min was constant to within 3% for LR rotations up to +/-15 degrees . The Monte Carlo dose probability histograms showed that, with correction, a margin of 4 mm ensured that 90% of patients received a D min >or=95% of the prescribed dose. Without correction a margin of 6 mm was required. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and tested a practical method for (online) correction of prostate rotation, allowing safe and straightforward implementation of margin reduction and dose escalation.
Authors: Nienke A Hoffmans-Holtzer; Daan Hoffmans; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Orit Gutfeld; Annette E Kretzler; Rojano Kashani; Daniel Tatro; James M Balter Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dale W Litzenberg; James M Balter; Scott W Hadley; Daniel A Hamstra; Twyla R Willoughby; Patrick A Kupelian; Toufik Djemil; Arul Mahadevan; Shirish Jani; Geoffrey Weinstein; Timothy Solberg; Charles Enke; Lisa Levine; Howard M Sandler Journal: Prostate Cancer Date: 2011-07-13
Authors: Jean L Peng; Chihray Liu; Yu Chen; Robert J Amdur; Kenneth Vanek; Jonathan G Li Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 2.102