BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that elevated soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) levels predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Recently, questions have been raised regarding the influence of pre-analytical and analytical conditions on measurement of sCD40L, and additional studies have had conflicting findings regarding the prognostic value of this marker. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured levels of sCD40L in citrated plasma using an analytically validated automated immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics) in a large cohort of ACS patients (n = 2403) from the placebo arm of the OPUS TIMI-16 trial. No association was observed between elevated sCD40L levels and risk of death or myocardial infarction (MI) (Quartile 1, 8.0%; Quartile 2, 11.7%; Quartile 3, 8.2%; Quartile 4, 6.8%; P = 0.54) or risk of death, MI or heart failure at 10 months (Quartile 1, 9.9%; Quartile 2, 14.2%; Quartile 3, 10.9%; Quartile 4, 8.3%; P = 0.55). A comparison of plasma vs. serum measurements of sCD40L was performed on samples from a nested case-control analysis (n = 42) from within this cohort. Median sCD40L levels did not differ between cases and controls using plasma (0.23 ng/ml vs. 0.27 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.82) or serum samples (0.64 vs. 0.77, respectively; P = 0.85). Serum samples consistently yielded elevated sCD40L measurements compared to plasma samples (median value 0.72 ng/ml vs. 0.25 ng/ml, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of an association between sCD40L and cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of patients with ACS raises concern regarding the reproducibility of clinical results with this novel biomarker. Despite a plausibly important role in the pathobiology of atherothrombosis, pre-analytic sources of variability may limit the practical clinical application of sCD40L.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that elevated soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) levels predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Recently, questions have been raised regarding the influence of pre-analytical and analytical conditions on measurement of sCD40L, and additional studies have had conflicting findings regarding the prognostic value of this marker. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured levels of sCD40L in citrated plasma using an analytically validated automated immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics) in a large cohort of ACS patients (n = 2403) from the placebo arm of the OPUS TIMI-16 trial. No association was observed between elevated sCD40L levels and risk of death or myocardial infarction (MI) (Quartile 1, 8.0%; Quartile 2, 11.7%; Quartile 3, 8.2%; Quartile 4, 6.8%; P = 0.54) or risk of death, MI or heart failure at 10 months (Quartile 1, 9.9%; Quartile 2, 14.2%; Quartile 3, 10.9%; Quartile 4, 8.3%; P = 0.55). A comparison of plasma vs. serum measurements of sCD40L was performed on samples from a nested case-control analysis (n = 42) from within this cohort. Median sCD40L levels did not differ between cases and controls using plasma (0.23 ng/ml vs. 0.27 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.82) or serum samples (0.64 vs. 0.77, respectively; P = 0.85). Serum samples consistently yielded elevated sCD40L measurements compared to plasma samples (median value 0.72 ng/ml vs. 0.25 ng/ml, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of an association between sCD40L and cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of patients with ACS raises concern regarding the reproducibility of clinical results with this novel biomarker. Despite a plausibly important role in the pathobiology of atherothrombosis, pre-analytic sources of variability may limit the practical clinical application of sCD40L.
Authors: V Henn; J R Slupsky; M Gräfe; I Anagnostopoulos; R Förster; G Müller-Berghaus; R A Kroczek Journal: Nature Date: 1998-02-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: P Aukrust; F Müller; T Ueland; T Berget; E Aaser; A Brunsvig; N O Solum; K Forfang; S S Frøland; L Gullestad Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-08-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F Mach; U Schönbeck; G K Sukhova; T Bourcier; J Y Bonnefoy; J S Pober; P Libby Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-03-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher Heeschen; Stefanie Dimmeler; Christian W Hamm; Marcel J van den Brand; Eric Boersma; Andreas M Zeiher; Maarten L Simoons Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nerea Varo; James A de Lemos; Peter Libby; David A Morrow; Sabina A Murphy; Rebecca Nuzzo; C Michael Gibson; Christopher P Cannon; Eugene Braunwald; Uwe Schönbeck Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-08-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eugene R Ahn; Gabriella Lander; Wenche Jy; Carlos J Bidot; Joaquin J Jimenez; Lawrence L Horstman; Yeon S Ahn Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: I Lambrinoudaki; M Karaflou; G Kaparos; O Grigoriou; A Alexandrou; C Panoulis; E Logothetis; M Creatsa; G Christodoulakos; E Kouskouni Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: David D Berg; Robert W Yeh; Laura Mauri; David A Morrow; Dean J Kereiakes; Donald E Cutlip; Qi Gao; Petr Jarolim; Alan D Michelson; Andrew L Frelinger; Abby L Cange; Marc S Sabatine; Michelle L O'Donoghue Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: J Szewieczek; J Dulawa; J Gminski; A Kurek; K Legierska; T Francuz; I Włodarczyk-Sporek; M Janusz-Jenczen; B Hornik Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Jan Szewieczek; Tomasz Francuz; Jan Dulawa; Katarzyna Legierska; Beata Hornik; Iwona Włodarczyk; Magdalena Janusz-Jenczeń; Agnieszka Batko-Szwaczka Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2015-08-21
Authors: Laura A Bosmans; Lena Bosch; Pascal J H Kusters; Esther Lutgens; Tom T P Seijkens Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2020-03-28 Impact factor: 4.132