Literature DB >> 21150016

Role of biomarkers in risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome.

C M Nagesh1, Ambuj Roy.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses a wide spectrum of myocardial ischaemia varying from assuredly benign to potentially fatal. Cardiac biomarkers have had a major impact on the management of this disease and are now the cornerstone in its diagnosis and prognosis. In this review we discuss both the established and the newer emerging biomarkers in ACS and their role in highlighting not only myocardial necrosis but also different facets of the pathophysiology of ACS. The future of cardiac biomarker testing may be in multimarker testing to better characterize each patient of ACS and thus tailor both short-term and long-term therapy accordingly. This novel concept, however, needs to be tested in clinical trials for its incremental value and cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21150016      PMCID: PMC3028962          DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.73419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Res        ISSN: 0971-5916            Impact factor:   2.375


Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an umbrella term for a wide spectrum of clinical sign and symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischaemia. The ultimate clinical implication of ACS may therefore vary from assuredly benign to potentially fatal. Thus further risk stratification of this syndrome complex is imperative. It has been seen that 50 per cent of patients hospitalized for suspected ACS ultimately leave the hospital with other diagnoses1. Further management of ACS is resource-intensive and thus proper risk stratification is mandatory to avoid needless hospitalizations and interventional procedures. The traditional clinical tools for risk stratification such as history, physical examination, and ECG though undoubtedly important may prove to be inadequate in the majority of cases. This has led to the search for circulating markers that better establish diagnosis and thus aid in appropriate and rapid patient triage. The cardiac necrosis markers creatine phosphokinase and its isoenzymes and especially troponin have come to the forefront in the past decade to better identify high-risk individuals suitable for the most resource-intensive treatment. This is reflected in the various management guidelines of ACS where cardiac enzymes are the cornerstone in decision making. In addition, the success and usefulness of these biomarkers has led to intense research in this field resulting in several newer biomarkers emerging on the horizon of clinical use in ACS. In this review we discuss the role of these cardiac biomarkers; established and emerging in ACS (Table I) and also the growing evidence of support for the use of multiple biomarkers, each representative of a different facet of the pathophysiology of ACS (Table II).
Table I

Biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome

Established biomarkersEmerging biomarkers
Troponin IMyeloperoxidase
Troponin TMetalloproteinase
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)Soluble CD40 ligand
NT-Pro BNPIschemia modified albumin
C-reactive protein (CRP)Pregnancy-associated plasma
protein-A
Cystatin C
Fatty acid binding protein
Placental growth factor (PlGF)
Table II

Various biomarkers underscoring different facets of the pathophysiology and outcomes of ACS

Inflammation
  C-reactive protein
  Myeloperoxidase
  Matrix metalloproteinase
  Soluble CD40 ligand
Platelet activation
  Soluble CD40 ligand
Vulnerable plaque
  Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A
  Myeloperoxidase
  Placental growth factor
  Matrix metalloproteinase
Myocardial necrosis
  Creatine phophokinase and isoenzymes
  Troponin I and T
  Fatty acid binding protein
Ischaemia
  Ischaemia modified albumin
Pump failure
  Brain natriuretic peptide
  NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide
Biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome Various biomarkers underscoring different facets of the pathophysiology and outcomes of ACS

Established biomarkers

Cardiac troponin (cTn)

Cardiac troponin is a well established biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of ACS2–5. The data for troponins in ACS is robust even at minimally elevated levels. Measurement of cTnT and cTnI is now the crucial step in new diagnostic criteria for MI6. With current high quality analytic methods, cardiac troponin measurements are highly sensitive and specific for myocardial injury7. In the appropriate clinical setting (high certainty that the troponin is due to acute coronary syndrome) even minor elevations of troponin identify high risk underlying coronary morphology like patients with plaque rupture, large thrombus burden and distal embolisation8. These patients clearly benefit from aggressive anti-platelet, anti-thrombotic and revascularization therapy9. cTn typically increases more than 20 times above the upper limit of the reference range in myocardial infarction as compared to creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) which usually increases 10 times above the reference range. This provides an improved signal - to - noise ratio, enabling the detection of even minor degree of necrosis with troponin. The cTn begins to elevate 3 h from the onset of chest pain in MI. Because of the continuous release, cTn elevation persists for days (cTnI: 7-10 days, cTnT: 10-14 days). This prolonged course of release with troponin is advantageous for the late diagnosis of MI, however, it limits the diagnosis of early reinfarction. The cardiac troponin especially cTnT pose diagnostic challenges in patients of chronic renal failure1011. Frequent cTnT elevations (30 to 70% of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients compared with <5% in similar patients of cTnI) are seen in patients of renal failure in the absence of clinical suspicion of ACS1011. The putative mechanisms for chronic elevation of troponin in chronic renal disease patients include endothelial dysfunction, acute cardiac stretch, microinfarction and left ventricular hypertrophy12. However, it is important to understand that in the setting of acute coronary syndrome these patients should be treated as if renal failure were not present13as the short term prognostic value of troponin T for cardiovascular event is similar in patients with and without renal failure. Data comparing the two cTn suggest that cTnI may be slightly more sensitive. However, this may be due to different release kinetics of the two biomarkers and to different limits of detection of the currently available assays14. The other advantage of cTnI may be its greater specificity in patients of ESRD. However, the important advantage of cTnT is that due to international patent restrictions there is only one assay for its measurement, thus cTnT demonstrates a high degree of precision at the low end of measurement range and a relatively uniform cut-off concentration. In contrast, at least 18 different commercial assays for cTnI are available leading to considerable variation in the cut-off concentrations in the definition of a myocardial infarction by cTnI values1516. Thus, a clinician should be aware of the cTnI cut-off values specifically associated with the particular assay used by the laboratory.

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)

Brain natriuretic peptide is a neurohormone synthesized in ventricular myocardium and released in response to cardiac stretch. NT-ProBNP is the N-terminal fragment of the prohormone BNP. These natriuretic peptides have prognostic value across the full spectrum of acute coronary syndrome patients. Patients with elevated BNP or NT-proBNP are at significantly increased risk for subsequently developing heart failure and death both in the short- and long-term. This is seen regardless of their troponin levels and even when there is no clinical evidence of heart failure1718. The prognostic value of these peptides is over and above the conventional risk factors like age, Killip class and left ventricular ejection fraction. Studies have shown that BNP predicts high risk features in ACS, such as more severe underlying atherosclerosis, left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, and the burden of the ischaemic insult16. Thus it may be prudent to conclude that in patients with ACS, the higher the BNP, the more severe the haemodynamic insult due to ischaemia and the worse the prognosis.

C-reactive protein (CRP)

C-reactive protein is a nonspecific inflammatory marker that is released by the liver in response to the acute phase injury. CRP can be measured by multiple assays in acceptable precisions down to or below 0.3 mg/l and most give comparable results (designated as high-sensitive CRP or hsCRP). CRP in addition to BNP and troponin does appear to provide some additional value in the prognostication of ACS20; however, the incremental value is modest. In terms of the association of CRP and ACS it is important to distinguish cases without (unstable angina) and with necrosis (acute MI). In cases of AMI, CRP release is triggered as an acute phase reactant secondary to necrosis and levels of CRP are much higher and these have been correlated with infarct size. Though infarct size is the major determinant of long term prognosis after AMI; mortality has been shown to be related to CRP levels independent of left ventricular systolic function2122. In the absence of infarction, CRP levels correlate to the extent of atherosclerosis and some studies have shown that it predicts coronary events in patients of unstable angina independent of troponin levels2324. However, a more recent large prospective study showed only a weak association of CRP levels and future coronary events in patients of ACS and even this disappeared once adjusted for other common clinical variables. This study included about two-thirds of AMI patients and one-third unstable angina patients25. Another interesting implication of CRP in ACS has been in terms of treatment: in a study of ACS patients, those with low CRP levels after statin therapy had better clinical outcomes than those with higher CRP levels, regardless of the resultant level of LDL cholesterol. Thus implying that statin therapy in these high risk patients of ACS should be driven not only by the target lipid levels but also the CRP levels achieved26. These data suggest that CRP levels in ACS may be of prognostic significance but their incremental value over conventional factors and biomarkers may be modest.

Emerging biomarkers

Myeloperoxidase (MPO)

Myeloperoxidase is a haemoprotein and lysosomal enzyme released from neutrophilic granules and monocytes27. MPO is released into the extracellular fluid and general circulation during inflammatory conditions. This enzyme has been associated with oxidation of lipids contained within LDL, dysfunctional HDL and consumption of nitric oxide thus rendering the normally anti-thrombotic endothelial surface thrombogenic via expression of various pro-thrombotic and anti-fibrinolytic factors28. MPO elevation has been associated with adverse ventricular modeling after MI and with progression to heart failure29. MPO is responsible for fibrous cap disintegration making it a marker of plaque instability and inflammation. A recent study revealed that elevated MPO levels were marker of cardiac death independent of troponins, CRP in patients of ACS thus highlighting its utility in these patients30. However, increased MPO is not likely to be specific to cardiac diseases, as activation of neutrophil and macrophages can occur in any infectious, inflammatory or infiltrative disease process.

Soluble CD40 ligand

Soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) is expressed on platelets and released from them on activation. It has biological activity that can trigger an inflammatory reaction in vascular endothelial cells by the secretion of cytokines and chemokines31. Membrane bound CD40L and sCD40L forms interact with the CD40 receptor molecule, which is present not only on B cells but also on monocytes, macrophages, and endothelial and smooth muscle cells in atheroma, leading to release of matrix MMPs and subsequent destabilization of the plaque32. Thus upregulation of the CD40L system may play a pathogenic role also in triggering ACS. Increased sCD40L concentrations have been demonstrated in other inflammatory disorders, e.g., autoimmune diseases, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease, as well as in stroke, hypercholesterolaemia, and diabetes3233. In OPUS-TIMI16 trial increased sCD40L was associated with a higher risk for future death and recurrent myocardial infarction independent of other variables including cTnI and CRP. Importantly in combination with cardiac troponin I it significantly improved risk prediction for future death and MI34. Similarly in the CAPTURE study of ACS, increased sCD40L concentrations were associated with a higher risk of death and non-fatal MI. Notably elevation of soluble CD40 ligand identified the subgroup of patients likely to benefit from anti-platelet treatment with abciximab35. Therapeutic benefits of sCD40L were also seen in MIRACL Study wherein patients with acute coronary syndromes and high sCD40L had a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events with early statin therapy36. However, recent studies have flagged doubts on the influence of pre-analytical and analytical conditions on measurement of sCD40L and thus additional studies are warranted before implementing wider clinical use37.

Ischaemia modified albumin

Ischaemia induces a conformational change in albumin, so that it can no longer bind to transitional metals such as cobalt or copper. Using the albumin cobalt binding (ACB) test, the quantum of ischaemia modified albumin can be estimated and this serves as an index of ischaemia. Ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA) has been shown to be an independent predictor of short- and long-term adverse outcomes over and above conventional known risk in patients with ACS38. Increased IMA values may be found in patients with cancer, infections, end-stage renal disease, liver disease, and brain ischaemia also3940. The commercially available IMA test appears to be relatively sensitive for identifying unstable angina. However, the test’s specificity is relatively poor and the assay is cumbersome to use. With greater refinement it may be a useful test in the emergency department (ED) to rule out ischaemia which is more important at that stage.

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) is a large, zinc binding proteinase produced by different cell types, including fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells, male and female reproductive tissues and belongs to the insulin-like growth factor family. It is thought to be released when neovascularization occurs and thus may be a marker of incipient plaque rupture. Its level has been shown to be elevated in unstable plaques and in circulation in patients of ACS41. In study of patients with angiographically confirmed acute coronary syndrome, elevated serum PAPP-A was a strong independent predictor of death or recurrent MI, even in patients with normal serum troponin T42. Thus preliminary data suggest a possible novel role of PAPP-A in identifying vulnerable plaques, however, additional studies are needed. Moreover, standardized assays for PAPP-A are not available.

Cystatin C

Cystatin C is a low molecular weight basic protein that is freely filtered and metabolized after tubular reabsorption. There is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-(FDA) cleared assay that is analytically robust. Some studies have revealed the usefulness of the cystatin C as a prognostic marker in heart failure4344and acute coronary syndrome45. This protein is less influenced by age, gender, and muscle mass than serum creatinine and thus may be better indicator of cardiovascular risk than serum creatinine especially in elderly.

Fatty acid binding protein

It is one of the proteins which is rapidly released after myocardial infarction and is considered as alternative to myoglobin. It is an extremely valuable marker of myocardial necrosis in the early hours of ACS and more sensitive than CK-MB, CK-MB mass and cTn46.

Placental growth factor (PlGF)

It is one of the families of platelet-derived proteins that function as potent chemoattractants for monocytes and are involved in the regulation of vascular endothelial growth47. It has a high homology with vascular endothelial growth factor. Plasma PlGF measurements have been shown to be an independent biomarker of adverse outcome in patients with suspected ACS48. Plasma PlGF appears to extend the predictive and prognostic information gained from traditional biomarkers of necrosis, platelet activation, and systemic inflammation, and has great potential as an independent biomarker for plaque disruption, ischaemia, and thrombosis.

Multiple biomarker testing: will this be the future norm?

The emergence of different biomarkers in ACS provides insight into the varied pathophysiology of this disease. The future of ACS management would probably shift from single to multimarker testing leading to better characterization of each individual case and thus aid to singularize the stratagem of management of each case in the short- and long-term. In a study to assess the role of multi-marker testing cTnI, CRP and BNP were measured in 450 patients of ACS20. It was seen that the mortality was independently related to each biomarker tested and there was a near doubling of mortality rate for each additional biomarker that was positive. Similarly the short term and intermediate cardiac event rates were also strongly related to the number of biomarker positive at admission. The role of the multiple testing of emerging biomarkers over and above that of the currently established ones needs to be tested in a study and more importantly the impact of a biomarker highlighting a specific pathophysiologic mechanism of ACS in tailoring therapy for an individual patient needs to be established. Although there is still a long way till we reach this destination, it is a noble goal, and the desired direction for the future of cardiac medicine.

Conclusion

Importance of biomarkers, both in diagnosis and prognosis, of ACS is now well established. Biomarkers like troponin, BNP and CRP are in wide clinical use and substantial evidence of their utility in ACS is present. In addition, several newer biomarkers have recently emerged and may soon be in clinical use as these exemplify different facets of the pathophysiology of ACS and thus may have important therapeutic and prognostic implication over and above that of the established biomarkers. Moreover, these biomarkers would be mutually complementary to each other and thus multi-marker testing would help in better characterizing each case of ACS and may be the future norm.
  47 in total

1.  Standardization of cardiac troponin I assays: round Robin of ten candidate reference materials.

Authors:  R H Christenson; S H Duh; F S Apple; G S Bodor; D M Bunk; J Dalluge; M Panteghini; J D Potter; M J Welch; A H Wu; S E Kahn
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Torbjørn Omland; Anita Persson; Leong Ng; Russel O'Brien; Thomas Karlsson; Johan Herlitz; Marianne Hartford; Kenneth Caidahl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Platelet-derived CD40L: the switch-hitting player of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Patrick André; Lisa Nannizzi-Alaimo; Srinivasa K Prasad; David R Phillips
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Correlation of antemortem serum creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, troponin I, and troponin T with cardiac pathology.

Authors:  D S Ooi; P A Isotalo; J P Veinot
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Multimarker approach to risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: simultaneous assessment of troponin I, C-reactive protein, and B-type natriuretic peptide.

Authors:  Marc S Sabatine; David A Morrow; James A de Lemos; C Michael Gibson; Sabina A Murphy; Nader Rifai; Carolyn McCabe; Elliott M Antman; Christopher P Cannon; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Soluble CD40 ligand in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Christopher Heeschen; Stefanie Dimmeler; Christian W Hamm; Marcel J van den Brand; Eric Boersma; Andreas M Zeiher; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The ischemia-modified albumin biomarker for myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Alan H B Wu
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  2003-06

8.  Elevations in troponin T and I are associated with abnormal tissue level perfusion: a TACTICS-TIMI 18 substudy. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Graham C Wong; David A Morrow; Sabina Murphy; Nicole Kraimer; Rupal Pai; David James; Debbie H Robertson; Laura A Demopoulos; Peter DiBattiste; Christopher P Cannon; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Cardiac troponins in renal insufficiency: review and clinical implications.

Authors:  Benjamin J Freda; W H Wilson Tang; Frederick Van Lente; W Franklin Peacock; Gary S Francis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Myeloperoxidase and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 play a central role in ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Arman T Askari; Marie-Luise Brennan; Xiaorong Zhou; Jeanne Drinko; Annitta Morehead; James D Thomas; Eric J Topol; Stanley L Hazen; Marc S Penn
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  7 in total

1.  Value of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in predicting prognosis and severity of coronary artery disease in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Hanan Radwan; Abdelhakem Selem; Kamel Ghazal
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-05-05

2.  Troponin T and Heart Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein (h-Fabp) as Biomarkers in Patients Presenting with Chest Pain.

Authors:  Lakshmi Lavanya Reddy; Swarup A V Shah; Alpa J Dherai; Chandrashekhar K Ponde; Tester F Ashavaid
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2015-03-14

Review 3.  Endogenous bioactive peptides as potential biomarkers for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Takuya Watanabe; Kengo Sato; Fumiko Itoh; Kohei Wakabayashi; Masayoshi Shichiri; Tsutomu Hirano
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Emerging families of biomarkers for coronary artery disease: inflammatory mediators.

Authors:  Josef Yayan
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-31

Review 5.  Strategies and methods to study female-specific cardiovascular health and disease: a guide for clinical scientists.

Authors:  Pamela Ouyang; Nanette K Wenger; Doris Taylor; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Meir Steiner; Leslee J Shaw; Sarah L Berga; Virginia M Miller; Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.027

6.  Cystatin C in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Moushumi Lodh; Ashok Parida; Joy Sanyal; Arunangshu Ganguly
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2013-07-16

Review 7.  Sex differences in ischemic heart disease and heart failure biomarkers.

Authors:  Kimia Sobhani; Diana K Nieves Castro; Qin Fu; Roberta A Gottlieb; Jennifer E Van Eyk; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.027

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.