Literature DB >> 17911271

Predictors of short-term outcome in people with a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

Joshua A Cleland1, Julie M Fritz, Julie M Whitman, Rachel Heath.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to identify whether variables from the baseline examination or physical therapy interventions received could predict clinical outcomes for people with cervical radiculopathy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 96 consecutive patients referred for physical therapy for cervical radiculopathy were the sources of data for this study. All subjects underwent a standardized examination and completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at baseline and at discharge. The subjects were treated according to the discretion of the individual therapists. At the time of discharge, the subjects completed the Global Rating of Change as well. Subjects surpassing the minimal clinically important change for all 4 outcome tools were categorized as achieving short-term success. Individual variables from the examination and interventions provided were tested for univariate relationships with outcomes. Variables with a significance level of less than .10 were retained as potential predictor variables and were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to determine the most accurate set of variables for predicting outcomes.
RESULTS: The pretest probability for the likelihood of short-term (28-day follow-up) success was 53%. A 4-variable model optimally identified subjects who were most likely to achieve success with physical therapy interventions (age of <54 years; dominant arm is not affected; looking down does not worsen symptoms; and multimodal treatment including manual therapy, cervical traction, and deep neck flexor muscle strengthening for at least 50% of visits). When 3 of these 4 variables were present, the positive likelihood ratio (+LR) was 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]=2.4, 11.3), and the posttest probability of success was 85%. When all 4 variables were present, the +LR was 8.3 (95% CI=1.9, 63.9), and the posttest probability of success was 90%. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a subset of predictor variables can accurately identify which people with cervical radiculopathy are likely to experience short-term successful outcomes. The study design did not allow for the identification of a cause-and-effect relationship, but it appears that intermittent cervical traction, manual therapy, and deep neck flexor muscle strengthening may be beneficial in the management of cervical radiculopathy. Future research is needed to substantiate these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911271     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  20 in total

Review 1.  Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

2.  Multimodal management of mechanical neck pain using a treatment based classification system.

Authors:  Megan M Heintz; Eric J Hegedus
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

3.  Differential diagnosis of shoulder and cervical pain: a case report.

Authors:  Emily Joan Slaven; Jessie Mathers
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

4.  Cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review on treatment by spinal manipulation and measurement with the Neck Disability Index.

Authors:  Robert J Rodine; Howard Vernon
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-03

5.  The immediate effects of soft tissue mobilization versus therapeutic ultrasound for patients with neck and arm pain with evidence of neural mechanosensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Costello; Emilio 'Louie' J Puentedura; Josh Cleland; Charles D Ciccone
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-07

6.  Clinical course and prognostic models for the conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marije L S Sleijser-Koehorst; Michel W Coppieters; Martijn W Heymans; Servan Rooker; Arianne P Verhagen; Gwendolijne G M Scholten-Peeters
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise.

Authors:  Nicole H Raney; Evan J Petersen; Tracy A Smith; James E Cowan; Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Effect of slump stretching versus lumbar mobilization with exercise in subjects with non-radicular low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Amit Vinayak Nagrale; Shubhangi Pandurang Patil; Rita Amarchand Gandhi; Ken Learman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

9.  Treatment of a patient with cervical radiculopathy using thoracic spine thrust manipulation, soft tissue mobilization, and exercise.

Authors:  Michael Costello
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

10.  Multimodal treatment program comparing 2 different traction approaches for patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Moustafa; Aliaa A Diab
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.