Literature DB >> 17907427

Posterior spine fusion with Moss-Miami instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic, clinical and patient-centered outcomes.

Fernando De Maio1, Lori A Dolan, Vincenzo De Luna, Stuart L Weinstein.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the efficacy the Moss-Miami System instrumentation for surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Eight-five patients with AIS underwent a posterior spinal fusion with using this system between 1994 and 1998. Radiographs of the spine were taken preoperatively, at discharge, one year after surgery, and at the latest follow-up (average of 2.5 year, range 2 to 6 years). All radiographs were assessed for curve magnitude, coronal balance, kyphosis, lordosis, junctional kyphosis, and sagittal balance. The Scoliosis Research Society instrument was administered at the final follow-up. The average curve correction ranged from 53 to 65 percent. All patients showed solid fusion by final follow-up. Three patients required a second operation for complications related to their scoliosis; two patients showed a rod fracture without evidence of pseudoarthrosis or curve progression. Two transient neurological complications related to the surgery were observed. SRS results were favorable with regard to function and cosmetic appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17907427      PMCID: PMC2150647     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  44 in total

1.  Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion.

Authors:  L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Use of allograft bone for posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D P Grogan; V Kalen; T I Ross; K J Guidera; L I Pugh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms.

Authors:  J W Hardacker; R F Shuford; P N Capicotto; P W Pryor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Delayed infections after posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: revisited.

Authors:  B R Richards; K M Emara
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S F White; M A Asher; S M Lai; D C Burton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion for scoliosis. A comparison of autogeneic and allogeneic bone grafts.

Authors:  B F Aurori; R J Weierman; H A Lowell; C I Nadel; J R Parsons
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Infections in surgery of idiopathic scoliosis].

Authors:  R Grosman; O Vlach; M Leznar
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.531

9.  Coronal decompensation produced by Cotrel-Dubousset "derotation" maneuver for idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  K H Bridwell; J W McAllister; R R Betz; G Huss; M Clancy; P L Schoenecker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Current concepts and management of patients with fixed decompensated spinal deformity.

Authors:  D S Bradford; C B Tribus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.