Literature DB >> 1523512

Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion.

L G Lenke1, K H Bridwell, C Baldus, K Blanke.   

Abstract

Between 1985 and 1988, 50 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with either King Type II (n = 19) or III (n = 31) curves were treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Five of these patients had early postoperative decompensation, and have provided important lessons for the future prevention and treatment of these imbalances. Most problematic was distinguishing between King Type II and double major curve patterns. Proper identification of King Type II curves, which may be successfully treated with selective thoracic fusion, requires careful analysis of the standing preoperative coronal radiograph as well as the side benders. Thus, we now define Type II curves based on the differential between the thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude, apical vertebral deviation from the midline, and apical vertebral rotation on the standing coronal radiograph in addition to a positive flexibility index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1523512     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199208001-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: what if we choose lumbar apical vertebra as distal fusion end?

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Selective thoracic fusion in AIS curves: the definition of target outcomes improves the prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Heidrun Albrecht; Rene Schmidt; Juliane Zenner; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Bingfang Zeng; Jianguang Xu; Hua Chen; Tao Zhang; Wei Zhou; Weiqing Kong; Yishan Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Variability of spinal instrumentation configurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle; Oana C Ciolofan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Extensive fusion for Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Surgical Overcorrection of Lenke Type 1 Deformities with Selective Fusion Segments: What Happens to the Coronal Balance?

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Sinan Erdogan; Yunus Emre Akman; Murat Mert; Engin Carkci; Tolga Tuzuner
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 7.  Restoring sagittal and frontal balance following posterior instrumented fusion.

Authors:  Ozgur Dede; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

8.  Assessment of Coronal Radiographic Parameters of the Spine in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Mohsen Karami; Arash Maleki; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-10

9.  Posterior correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw instrumentation: results of 48 patients with minimal 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kan Min; Christoph Sdzuy; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Correction of idiopathic scoliosis using the H-frame system.

Authors:  A J Hosman; G H Slot; W J Beijneveld; J van Limbeek; M A Kooijman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.