AIM: To examine genetic variation of nucleotide oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) and NOD2, their respective influences on Crohn's disease phenotype and gene-gene interactions. METHODS: (ND(1)+32656*) NOD1 polymorphism and SNP8, SNP12 and SNP13 of NOD2 were analyzed in 97 patients and 50 controls. NOD2 variants were determined by reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. NOD1 genotyping and NOD2 variant confirmation were performed by specific amplification and sequencing. RESULTS: The distribution of NOD1 polymorphism in patients was different from controls (P = 0.045) and not altered by existence of NOD2 mutations. In this cohort, 30.92% patients and 6% controls carried at least one NOD2 variant (P < 0.001) with R702W being the most frequent variant. Presence of at least one NOD2 mutation was inversely associated with colon involvement (9.09% with colon vs 36.4% with ileal or ileocolonic involvement, P = 0.04) and indicative of risk of penetrating disease (52.63% with penetrating vs 25.64% with non-penetrating or stricturing behavior, P = 0.02). L1007finsC and double NOD2 mutation conferred the highest risk for severity of disease (26.3% with penetrating disease vs 3.8% with non-penetrating or stricturing behavior presented L1007finsC, P = 0.01 and 21.0% with penetrating disease vs 2.5% with non-penentrating or stricturing behavior carried double NOD2 mutation, P = 0.007). Exclusion of patients with NOD2 mutations from phenotype/NOD1-genotype analysis revealed higher prevalence of *1*1 genotype in groups of younger age at onset and colonic location. CONCLUSION: This study suggests population differences in the inheritance of risk NOD1 polymorphism and NOD2 mutations. Although no interaction between NOD1-NOD2 was noticed, a relationship between disease location and Nod-like receptor molecules was established.
AIM: To examine genetic variation of nucleotide oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) and NOD2, their respective influences on Crohn's disease phenotype and gene-gene interactions. METHODS: (ND(1)+32656*) NOD1 polymorphism and SNP8, SNP12 and SNP13 of NOD2 were analyzed in 97 patients and 50 controls. NOD2 variants were determined by reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. NOD1 genotyping and NOD2 variant confirmation were performed by specific amplification and sequencing. RESULTS: The distribution of NOD1 polymorphism in patients was different from controls (P = 0.045) and not altered by existence of NOD2 mutations. In this cohort, 30.92% patients and 6% controls carried at least one NOD2 variant (P < 0.001) with R702W being the most frequent variant. Presence of at least one NOD2 mutation was inversely associated with colon involvement (9.09% with colon vs 36.4% with ileal or ileocolonic involvement, P = 0.04) and indicative of risk of penetrating disease (52.63% with penetrating vs 25.64% with non-penetrating or stricturing behavior, P = 0.02). L1007finsC and double NOD2 mutation conferred the highest risk for severity of disease (26.3% with penetrating disease vs 3.8% with non-penetrating or stricturing behavior presented L1007finsC, P = 0.01 and 21.0% with penetrating disease vs 2.5% with non-penentrating or stricturing behavior carried double NOD2 mutation, P = 0.007). Exclusion of patients with NOD2 mutations from phenotype/NOD1-genotype analysis revealed higher prevalence of *1*1 genotype in groups of younger age at onset and colonic location. CONCLUSION: This study suggests population differences in the inheritance of risk NOD1 polymorphism and NOD2 mutations. Although no interaction between NOD1-NOD2 was noticed, a relationship between disease location and Nod-like receptor molecules was established.
Authors: H Zouali; S Lesage; F Merlin; J-P Cézard; J-F Colombel; J Belaiche; S Almer; C Tysk; C O'Morain; M Gassull; S Christensen; Y Finkel; R Modigliani; C Gower-Rousseau; J Macry; M Chamaillard; G Thomas; J-P Hugot Journal: Gut Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Concepción Núñez; Manuel Barreiro; J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz; Aurelio Lorenzo; Carlos Zapata; A Salvador Peña Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Mark Tremelling; Laura Hancock; Francesca Bredin; Daniel Sharpstone; Shiela A Bingham; Miles Parkes Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Marie Pierik; Huiying Yang; Michael M Barmada; Juleen A Cavanaugh; Vito Annese; Steven R Brant; Judy H Cho; Richard H Duerr; Jean-Pierre Hugot; Dermot P McGovern; Paulina Paavola-Sakki; Graham L Radford-Smith; P Pavli; Mark S Silverberg; Stephan Schreiber; Kent D Taylor; Robert Vlietinck Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Naohiro Inohara; Yasunori Ogura; Ana Fontalba; Olga Gutierrez; Fernando Pons; Javier Crespo; Koichi Fukase; Seiichi Inamura; Shoichi Kusumoto; Masahito Hashimoto; Simon J Foster; Anthony P Moran; Jose L Fernandez-Luna; Gabriel Nuñez Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-01-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Olga Gutierrez; Carlos Pipaon; Naohiro Inohara; Ana Fontalba; Yasunori Ogura; Felipe Prosper; Gabriel Nunez; Jose L Fernandez-Luna Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-08-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Georgina L Hold; Megan Smith; Charlie Grange; Euan Robert Watt; Emad M El-Omar; Indrani Mukhopadhya Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Calen A Steiner; Jeffrey A Berinstein; Jeremy Louissaint; Peter D R Higgins; Jason R Spence; Carol Shannon; Cathy Lu; Ryan W Stidham; Joel G Fletcher; David H Bruining; Brian G Feagan; Vipul Jairath; Mark E Baker; Dominik Bettenworth; Florian Rieder Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Claudia Huebner; Lynnette R Ferguson; Dug Yeo Han; Martin Philpott; Murray L Barclay; Richard B Gearry; Alan McCulloch; Pieter S Demmers; Brian L Browning Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2009-03-27